Laserfiche WebLink
Mou;ids City Council. E,�ay 14, 19P4 <br />Rogular Meeting i "L� . �pagc S.•,zn <br />---------- •---••---------•-------------------- <br />:i Iwe: ',c_• l:anEner reported she !-,;(I attcndai the <br />�Is!:k ;I,rce nceti. g, and she found rl: r.:iAC has an <br />rt•afr ,ce., i0. 51, I'm Flyint; Cl.oui Ai_•por , whi.:', <br />types of aircraft out or tl:e airport. <br />$:le added the ordi.r.ance is unique to t•lying Clout, <br />Airport and :,sked V Mounds view could regh+nn <br />something sih:hilar. <br />Atturney Meyers replied he had spoken to [hefty 0411E <br />it' -fore, and 'Inc, sculd check again. <br />Attorney M2ycr.s p.resented a proposed resolution, <br />th-aftCiL r f �.rnnt ii5-'rift, th^_ SpeClni CJIP ae1- for the <br />City, end ^.;,cd J aucil approval of the :esolu ion. <br />Lie poit:ted Out teal. th" resOlntio'h spe[:Li C.".l.l.}' states <br />the City of Fridley be asked to joih: in d'e effort. <br />'hero waE, c,ttaiderabla di.scussi.or. Council <br />regn:-ding tile proposed resolutions. <br />dankner stated she :ou" d prefer writing <br />a letter to Fridley, rather than rjuttill^ it in <br />resolution form. <br />Counn'•i,"ember Linkb cliesticned wih;• 11r. Merritt would <br />cbe rcprec:nting the dity nt the June 7 meeting, <br />rather: titan Attorney Mcyers. lato. PI yers rcp.'•.ied <br />that while he most 'likely would be present, the City R <br />has aetainel. Mr. `;•or:'i.t': as co -counsel, fort e <br />:nvironmental cssessment, so he would be malting the <br />presentation. <br />Councl'.-1en,'Lcr ilanku.er s'. %ad she would like to meet <br />tor. Merritt and see his presentation first-. <br />Counciiveimber Linke su�,gestcd holding off on the <br />resolution until the Council has had an opportunity <br />`o meet with Mr, lierritt, which • tuld al.lew them <br />time to contact tte Cicy of Fridley and discuss <br />things further. <br />action/Second: McCarty/Doty to approve the reso- <br />T-ut`icn P— 7 send to Fridley. <br />ayes 1nay <br />There was discussion before the vote was I -:•':en on the <br />previous motion. <br />Cohmcilmember llankner voted against the motion, <br />stating that while the City is paying 11r• Merritt $1.25 <br />;or hour, she ;rculd like to meet him :nd have some <br />qucrticns cnswered before voting on Cho rosolution. <br />Councilor -amber Linl,e suggested tnbl.ing the vote <br />until the May 7.9 r setin allow'- , them time to <br />t! <br />M-".on Carried <br />