My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1984/06/25
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1984
>
Agenda Packets - 1984/06/25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 12:55:51 PM
Creation date
3/19/2025 12:55:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
6/25/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
U 0 VED <br />PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW <br />RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA <br />Regular Meetingg <br />June 11, 1984 <br />Mounds View City Hall <br />2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 <br />----------------------------------------------------------------------- <br />The Mounds View City Council was called to order by 1. Call to Order <br />Mayor McCarty at 7:30 PM on June 11, 1984. <br />The Pledge of Allegiance was said. 2. Pledge of <br />Allegiance <br />MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmembers Blanchard, Doty, 3. Roll Call <br />Links and MayoF McCarty. <br />It was noted Councilmember Hankner was on vacation. <br />ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Meyers, Clerk/Admini- <br />strator Pauley and Public Works/Community Development <br />Director Thatcher. <br />Motion/Second: Blanchard/Linke to approve the May 4. Approval of <br />minutes as corrected. Minutes: <br />May 29, 1984 <br />3 ayes 0 nays 1 abstention <br />Motion Carried <br />Councilmember Doty abstained from the vote as he had <br />not been present at the May 29 meeting. <br />Jim Vleck, 7920 Groveland, questioned why his property 5. Residents Re - <br />had been rezoned from R-1 to R-2, without notifying quests and <br />him, and how that rezoning might effect his property Comments from <br />taxes. the Floor <br />Mayor McCarty explained the rezoning corrected the <br />zoning from R-1, to bring it into compliance with the <br />Comprehensive Plan, as duplexes are not allowed in an <br />R-1 area. He added he did not believe there should <br />be any significant change in the property taxes. <br />Attorney Meyers clarified that the County Assessor <br />would have been assessing the property in the past <br />on the use it was being put to, so there should be <br />no change, <br />.-/ <br />Clerk/Administrator Pau'ey explained this rezoning was <br />classified non -controversial, as the action will have <br />no effect on the property and just brought it into <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.