My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1984/10/01
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1984
>
Agenda Packets - 1984/10/01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 2:21:48 PM
Creation date
3/19/2025 2:21:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
10/1/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
U N A V E D <br />Mounds View City Council. September. 24, 1984 <br />fh Regular Meeting -------Page-Three <br />---------------------------------- -------------- <br />Councilmember Linke clarified his position for <br />Mr. Petrini on the airport issue, to correct <br />Mr. Petrini's mistaken comments on Councilmember <br />Linke's stand. <br />Mayor McCarty stated the City has an estimate of a <br />approximately $100,000 to fund their lawsuit, and it <br />is his personal feeling that it could be paid for <br />without any additional taxes, and could be taken from <br />def4eeenee defeaseance, tie stated he feels it would <br />be a good investment, and they must decide what the <br />limit is to be. <br />Councilmember Doty stated there is $180,000 in the <br />contingency fund that he feels could be used to cover <br />the costs. <br />Councilmember Hankner explained the process she feels <br />the City has gone through in the past year and she <br />also stated how important; it is to not reveal all the <br />strategy they have planned, as it could be used against <br />them in court, with MAC having an advantage of knowing <br />what the City had planned. <br />Due to the heated comments and accusations being made, <br />a recess was taken. Upon calling hack to order, Attorney <br />Meyers reveiwed the history of the airport situation and <br />stated that several questionnaires have been received <br />back that will be used to prepare affidavits toward <br />injunctions, as a basis for obtaining restraining orders <br />as well as notifying the FAA and Congressmen that the <br />City has specific concerns and questions. <br />1 <br />Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty that the Council be en <br />record as standing opposed to the current Master Plan <br />Eor the Anoka County Airport, reserving runway place- <br />ment and configurations for future consideration. <br />2 ayes 2 nay 1 abstention Motion Failed <br />Councilmember Blanchard stated she refused to vote <br />on the motion as she feels it has become a totally <br />political issue at City Hall and she has stated her views <br />on the airport innumerable times before. <br />Councilmember Linke stated he was not opposed to the <br />movement of the north/south runway to the north, as they <br />already have people with irrepairable damage from where <br />it is presently located, and leaving it where it is will <br />cause them nothing but further harm. <br />Mayor McCarty stated his intent is to oppose the current <br />Master Plan but still hold true to the belief that the <br />reaway be moved north. <br />Councilmember Hankner stated she agrees with Council - <br />member Linke, and that in passing this <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.