My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1984/10/22
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1984
>
Agenda Packets - 1984/10/22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 2:22:54 PM
Creation date
3/19/2025 2:22:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
10/22/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
157
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL <br />FROM: CLERK -ADMINISTRATOR: <br />DATE: OCTOBER 19, 1984 <br />SUBJECT: COOPERATIVE HOME INSURANCE PROGRAM (CHIP) <br />Attached is a photocopy of a letter from William C. Hanna of <br />CI.MA, Inc. regarding their efforts with the League of Minnesota <br />Cities to start a CHIP program in the State of Minnesota and <br />a booklet on the CHIP program: <br />In simple terms, the purpose of a CHIP program is to develop <br />a cooperative effort between a city and a private insurance <br />carrier to offer home insurance to owners of 1-4 unit build- <br />ings offering the following features. <br />1. Reduced premiums resulting from a more accurate <br />reflection of the quality of the city's housing <br />stock, public safety system, and historical loss <br />experience. <br />i" 2. A security analysis of each building, when re- <br />quested by the owner, whether or not insurance <br />is purchased through the CHIP program. <br />3. If a return in premium paid i.s generated as a <br />result of favorable loss experience, the re- <br />turned premium is gifted to the city on the <br />owners behalf for Public Safety purposes. <br />You may be saying to yourself, "This sounds good, but why can't <br />all of this be available without our having to enter into an <br />arrangement with an insurance carrier?" Private insurance <br />carriers presently pool their loss experience irregardless <br />of the location of the home and offer reduced premiums only <br />for certain items such as non-smokers and participants in <br />Operation I.L'.. Thus, policyholders do not always experience <br />the full benefit of participating in these programs as not - <br />participants "hold" them down. Also, if an insurance carrier <br />experiences fewer claims they simply have a greater profit <br />which is not always reflected in reduced premiums. <br />Under the CHIP program all policyholders must participate in <br />the Home Security Program and since the carrier gets specified <br />percentages of premiums for expenses, commissions, profits, etc., <br />any money set aside for claims but not paid out must be return- <br />ed as a premium refund. <br />Based on the information before you, the City faces no liabil- <br />ity for participating in such a program and our only expense <br />would be the Home Security Program which would be conducted by <br />US. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.