My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1985/01/02
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1985
>
Agenda Packets - 1985/01/02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/20/2025 11:08:48 AM
Creation date
3/20/2025 11:02:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
1/2/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
133
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
LUEET-8. PLANNING AND ZONING LAW CHANGES (B) <br />The League supports legislation conforming the s <br />use Dian with the statutory procedures for <br />a <br />Existing state law requires a simple majority vote of a city council to <br />adopt or amend a comprehensive land use plan, but requires a supermajority (2/3) <br />vote to amend a zoning ordinance. The differing voting requirements cause a <br />problem because the law also requires the plan and implementing ordinances to be <br />consistent with each other. Situations have arisen where a majority of the <br />council votes to amend the city's comprehensive plan but there is not enough <br />support to effectuate a zoning change. In order to facilitate the process and <br />avoid possible legal challenges, the League proposes to amend the law to require <br />a supermajority vote to amend a city's comprehensive plan. <br />The preceding problem is one of many problem areas in our planning and <br />zoning laws. Recent piecemeal amendments have compounded, not helped, the <br />problem. Therefore, the League recommends that the Legislature create a task <br />force to reform the state planning and zoning laws. The task force should be <br />composed of representatives from cities and other local units of government. <br />LUEET-9. ENERGY CONSERVATION AND PRODUCTION (C) <br />The League supports legislation providing incentives for <br />Overall energy conservation strategies involving the public, private, <br />commercial, and industrial sectors are being developed by cities based on the <br />rationale that conservation efforts achieve the greatest energy savings at the <br />lowest cost. The League believes that a city's individual energy conservation <br />strategy can be accomplished if the legislature permits or establishes some of <br />the following measures: <br />1. Retrofit of Local Government Buildings. Local governments and school <br />districts operate nearly 8,000 buildings in Minnesota. Possible energy savings <br />in this sector range from 16-67 percent of current energy consumption by <br />implementing operation maintenance changes and capital improvements programs. <br />The League recommends support of the use of special levies to local governments <br />for implementation of energy conservation measures, including building energy <br />audits. This special levy could be designed to complement 1983 legislation <br />authorizing 10-year installment payment contracts for capital equipment or <br />services intended to improve the energy efficiency of municipally owned <br />buildings. It would also supplement the existing special purpose capital <br />expenditure levy law available now only to school districts. <br />2. District Heating. To promote statewide applications of district heating <br />technology and to allow communities to make most efficient use of the State <br />District Heating Bond Program, the League recommends the following; <br />-30- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.