Laserfiche WebLink
DS-6. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PRINCIPLES (C) <br />The League supports legislation which continues state assistance to cities ok <br />for community and economic development. The League encourages the legislature <br />to appropriate funds for direct assistance to business for economic development. <br />Ae a matter of principle, the state should not encourage the use of such direct <br />assistance for the sole purpose of moving businesses from one Minnesota city to <br />another. Technical assistance should be furnished by the appropriate state <br />agencies to aid cities in promoting local development activities. <br />Minnesota cities have traditionally been responsible for their own economic <br />growth. During the 60's and 70's, cities promoted development through the use <br />of industrial revenue bonds, tax increment financing, and housing (or mortgage <br />revenue) bonds. Substantial federal grant programs supplemented local resources. <br />The economic realities of the 1980's require even greeter efforts by cities <br />in community and economic development. As federal assistance disappears, cities <br />are forced to become more creative in the use and leveraging of available <br />resources. <br />In recent years, the state has assisted cities' development efforts through <br />legislation and agency -administered programs, including Minnesota Main Street, <br />Star Citles, Minnesota !lousing Finance Agency loan programs, and small business <br />rehabilitation loan programs. State legislation must continue to provide <br />maximum flexibility for cities to carry out community development activities. <br />Additionally, the state must actively promote economic development through <br />direct assistance to businesses and more extensive technical assistance to <br />maximize cities' ability to leverage local, state, and federal resources. <br />Any proposed community and economic development legislation should respond <br />to the following concerns: <br />1) Protection of cities' ability to finance capital improvements. <br />2) Management of economic growth to maximize cities' existing capital. <br />investment. <br />3) Revitalization of cities reversing the trend of dispersion of <br />population and economic activity. <br />4) Recognition and allowance for the great differences between cities <br />ri.garding their atages of growth and development, demographics, and <br />types of economic activity within and adjacent to their borders. <br />5) The legislature should enable the Small Business Finance Agency to <br />package projects which are approved by local city councils into larger <br />industrial revenue bonds. <br />DS-7. TAX-EXEMPT STATUS OF LAND HELD BY CITIES FOR DEVELOPMENT (C) <br />Up until recently, almost all property owned by political subdivisions was <br />granted tax-exempt statue. In 1979, the legislature changed the law to provide <br />that op rt held by a olitical uhdivisi�� of the efle for later Sesgle for <br />econollc sev9lopment put oses woul� be cone eyed ore <br />-37- <br />