Laserfiche WebLink
OICONNOR & HANNAN <br />ATTORNEYS AT LAW <br />�1%'12131Q,�i <br />2800 IDS TOWCR <br />ao SOUTH EIGHTH STREET <br />p sit PC <br />.I.a <br />6VA.M.Y1.Y1,.... <br />a.C. 10000•8.43 <br />P�C� <br />( <br />;Y�P��4P <br />."1400 <br />MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA a5./02-22 <br />�" <br />iJ <br />(412) 341-3400 <br />COL..+.11+ <br />TELEX 20-0E94 <br />a1M• <br />OIO..00 40103 <br />TELECO.IER 012 34I.2800 (!ES) <br />i1 .10 •.,00 <br />VIWOVPI.1 <br />THOMAS D. CREIGHTON <br />moue I.Lima, <br />DIRECT DIAL MUMMER <br />Q1.11.00 <br />MEMORANDUM <br />T1m nw <br />(all) a.3-1900 <br />TO: City Administrators, North Suburban Cable <br />Commission <br />FROM: Steven Schmidt, Chair <br />Thomas D. Creighton, Legal Counsel <br />DATE: March 8, 1985 <br />RE: 1985 Budget Contributions of Each City <br />The Chair of the North Suburban Cable Commission has <br />requested that I communicate with each of you regarding <br />the 1985 city contributions to the Commission budget. As <br />you recall, the 1985 budget for the North Suburban Cable <br />Communications Commission was submitted to you in the fall <br />of 1984. In that transmittal the procedures of the Joint <br />Powers Agreement were explained that if a city did not <br />withdraw from the Cable Commission by the end of 1984, <br />the budget would be deemed to be approved. Some cities <br />affirmatively approved the budget, others chose to proceed <br />under the Joint Powers Agreement's passive approval pro- <br />cess. At any rate the budget has been approved by all ten <br />cities. <br />The budget of the Commission has been funded in the <br />past by contributions from each city based on their number <br />of votes on the Cable Commission. After the city money <br />has been transmitted to the Cable Commission, it is <br />recovered from Group W as an advance on the franchise <br />10 <br />