My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1985/05/06
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1985
>
Agenda Packets - 1985/05/06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2025 8:52:36 AM
Creation date
3/24/2025 8:52:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
5/6/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
181
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator 6 City Council <br />FROM: Director of Public Works/Community Development <br />DATE: May 2, 1985 <br />RE: HERBST AND SUNS DEMULCrION COMPANY <br />Herbst and Sons Demolition Company has applied to the City to <br />construct a warehouso addition to their existing building located <br />at 2299 County Road H. <br />Enclosed please find the following: <br />1. Staff report dated 4/17/85 <br />2. Memo to Planning Commission from Director of Public <br />Works/Community Development dated 4/23/85 <br />3. Copy of Pages 106 and 107 from Gunnar Insberg's book on <br />Land Use Planning. This is a definition of spot zoning. <br />Unfortunately, I do not have copies of the site plan to submit to <br />you at the present time. Herbst and Sons will provide additional <br />copies of the site plan on Monday night. <br />I will now present the background on this property and describe <br />the issues. The City's Land Use Comprehensive Plan indicates <br />that this property should be for Highway Commercial use. The <br />zoning on this property is B-3, Highway Business District. The <br />existing use is for sandblasting and warehouse storage space for <br />demolition equipment. The property, as far as I can tell, has <br />always been used for a warehouse. This is an Industrial zone <br />use. The warehouse use may have been permitted in a B-3 zone in <br />past zoning ordinances. The sandblasting operation is a more <br />recent use of the property. In any case, the present use is <br />non -conforming and Herbst and Sons may not, under the existing <br />zoning, build an addition to their warehouse building. The issue <br />then becomes, should the City deny the building addition because <br />the zoning is incorrect for the present use ever, if that building <br />has always been used as a warehouse? (A warehouse is a permitted <br />use only in the Inoustrial zone.) <br />The same problem exists on the lot directly east of Herbst's <br />property. Pettibone runs their warehousing operation out of this <br />adjacent property. <br />A second issue or question is that if the property is rezoned <br />from B-3 to I-1 is this spot zoning? The attachment entitled <br />"Gunnar Insberg Land Use Planning" defines spot zoning. The <br />Planning Commission and Staff's analysis is that if the two lots <br />are rezoned from B-3 to I-1 that this is probably not spot <br />zoning. The justification for rezoning this property to its <br />present use is that the use has always been I-1. In fact, there <br />are other single lots that are definitely a spot zone within the <br />City of Mounds View. An example is the K Gas Station at 2901 <br />Highway 10. This single piece of property, as you know, has <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.