Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council R r `.. h , , � �� April 22, 1985 <br />Regular Meeting � r , i.?':` q , t . - Page Four <br />------------------------j �13_ <br />Haake/Hankner to approve the con- 8. Approval <br />ditio�use permit for M. H. Anderson for flood M. H. And <br />plain excavation, a flood plain use permit and a Conditions se <br />minor subdivision, contingent upon approval from Permit <br />the Rice Creek Watershed District. <br />5 ayes 0 nays <br />Motion Carried <br />Motion/Second: Quick/Blanchard to have the first 9. <br />1st Reading of <br />reading of Ordinance No. 388, an ordinance amending <br />Ordinance No. <br />Chapter 48 of the Mounds View Municipal Code <br />388 <br />entitled "Wetland Zoning Ordinance" and waive the <br />reading, <br />5 ayes 0 nays <br />Motion Carried <br />Councilmember Quick explained his reason for the <br />motion is the original designation of the area is <br />in error. <br />Motion/Second: Hankner/Quick to have the second 10. <br />2nd Reading and <br />reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 385, an <br />Adoption of <br />ordinance amending the Municipal Code of Mounds <br />Ordinance No. <br />View by amending Chapter 70 entitled "Municipal Water <br />385 <br />System" and waive the reading. <br />Councilmember Quick - aye <br />Councilmember Blanchard - aye <br />Councilmember Haake - aye <br />Councilmember Hankner - aye <br />Mayor Linke - aye <br />Motion. Carried <br />Dick Kraft, of Kunz Oil Company, explained the 11. Kunz Oil <br />Planning Commission had approved their latest Development <br />plan, and they have made the landscaping changes Review <br />requested by the Planning Commission, and have done <br />everything else they were asked to. He explained <br />they would be removing the existing building and <br />replace it with a modern facility. They will also <br />be reducing their hours, from being open 24 hours <br />a day, to being open from 6 AM to 10 PM. <br />Attorney Meyers reminded the Council they presently <br />have a case before the court involving the City of <br />Mounds View and Greg Johnson, and the issue of the <br />Comp Plan will be resolved by the trial court. He <br />explained the City has argued the property abutts <br />a busy highway and the property should ultimately <br />be developed medium density residential. He <br />added that inconsistency has been found to be <br />an adequate reason for denial. <br />Councilmember Hankner stated they had earlier <br />