My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1985/05/06
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1985
>
Agenda Packets - 1985/05/06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2025 8:52:36 AM
Creation date
3/24/2025 8:52:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
5/6/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
181
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Citv Council April 22, 1985 <br />Regular Meeting Page Seven <br />----------------------------------._--------- ----- ---------------- <br />The Council stated that based on their calculations, <br />the developer could possibly get 12 if not 13 lots <br />with the density bonus. <br />Director Thatcher reviewed the Planning C,:rmissions 13 <br />Resolution No. 128-85. Park Director Anderson <br />explained the project is planned for 1990. <br />Councilmember Hankner expressed concern about <br />approving the project now and locking a future <br />Council into it. She also recommended adding the <br />approval of the Ramsey County Highway Department <br />to the resolution. <br />Motion/Second: Haake/Blanchard to approve the pro- <br />posal torthe Ramsey County Park and Recreation <br />Department dated March 6, 1985 to construct a trail <br />along the south side of Rice Creek, with the addition <br />of #6, that it be contingent upon approval of the <br />Ramsey County Public Works Department. <br />5 ayes 0 nays <br />Ramsey County <br />Park and Rec <br />Departments <br />Request Regar <br />Rice Creek <br />Motion Carried <br />Director Thatcher reviewed the plans for the propos- 14. Consideration of <br />ed project. He explained a walkway is not planned Gale -Yost Addn. <br />at this time but could be added, and would cost the on Laport Drive <br />City approximately $1,500. <br />Clerk/Administrator Pauley stated the funds would <br />have to come from the contingency fund. He suggested <br />making an amendment to the proposed resolution and <br />having Staff report back on the source of the funds. <br />He pointed out also that there could likely be a <br />:egrest for a fence on both sides of the walkway, <br />and lighting, which would increase the cost. <br />Councilmember Hankner suggested that rather than <br />including it as part of the development now, it <br />might be better to wait until the budget process for <br />the next year. <br />Mayor Linke replied it would be more expensive to <br />come back later to do the work. <br />Motion/Second: Quick/Haake to approve the plans and <br />specifications for the Gale -Yost addition as presented, <br />with the addition of a paved walkway from the north end <br />of the cul-de-sac to Arden Avenue, and placement of a <br />light at the pole located half way between Arden and <br />Laport, dependent upon approval of the residents, and <br />direct Staff to schedule a bid opening date, identify <br />the source of funds and secure approvals from the <br />Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, '.Metropolitan Waste <br />Control Commission and the Minnesota Department of Health. <br />5 ayes 0 nays !lotion Carried <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.