Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council + `' "" W} <br />Regular Meeting <br />------------------------ -♦ �rirL_f_�lill <br />Tor Wistrom, representing Kraus Anderson, reviewed the <br />street light proposal and placement of the lights. He <br />added they have authorized NSP to go ahead and install <br />the street lights, and they hope to begin work later <br />this week. <br />Bob Wagner, 2590 Mounds View Drive, asked what the <br />S w eet iightinq WOLIJ consist ot. <br />Mr. Wistrom showed the plan for the lights and their <br />placement. <br />Director Thatcher explaineJ two lights have been in <br />place since 1982, hilt NSP would not turn them an until <br />the property was developed. <br />Joe Mesanz, 2626 Lake Court Drive, asked the status of <br />the rezoning. <br />Mayor Linke explained it had been approved with the <br />second readic,g and adoption earlier in the evening. <br />Councilmember Hankner explained some of the history of <br />the property, with the owner attempting to sell it and <br />finding a buyer in Super America. She explained the <br />developer is very willing to work with the City, and <br />the only reason rezoning was necessary was for the <br />installation of the gas pumps. She also pointed cut <br />that Super America has agreed that if in the future <br />the gas pumps are no longer being used, they will be <br />removed, along with the tanks. She added that as <br />members of the Council, they must be very careful <br />about the decisiur,s they make. <br />Mayor Linke closed the public hearing and reopened <br />the reyuldr nr_eting at 6:29 PM. <br />Attorney Meyers advis3d the Council to base their 14 <br />findings on section 40.25, Sutd. C, (21, whirh <br />includes that the use will not create an excessive <br />burden on existing narks, schools, atreeta and <br />ether public facilities and utilities which serve or <br />are proposed to serve the area, that the use will be <br />sufficiently compatihle or separated by distance or <br />screening from adjacent residentially zoned or used <br />land so that existing homes will not b^ depreciated <br />in value and there will be no deterrence to develop- <br />ment of vacant land, that the structure and site shall <br />have an appearance that will not have an adverse <br />effect upon adjacent residential properties, that <br />the use, in the opinion of the City Council, is <br />reasonably related to the overall needs of the City <br />and to the existing land use, that the use is consistent <br />with the purposes of the Zoning Code and the purposes <br />August 26, 1985 <br />Page Five - -- - - <br />Consideration <br />of Resolution <br />No. 1921 <br />