My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1985/09/16
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1985
>
Agenda Packets - 1985/09/16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2025 11:04:26 AM
Creation date
3/26/2025 11:04:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
9/16/1985
Description
Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council August 26, 14Ri <br />Regular Meeting Page Six <br />------------------------------------------------------------------------ <br />of the zoning district in which the applicant intends <br />to locate the proposed use, that the use is not in <br />conflict with the Comprehensive Plan of the City, that <br />the use will not causr traffic hazards or congestion <br />and that adequate utilities, access roads, drainage <br />and necessary facilities have been or will be provided. <br />Attorney Meyers also advised that a 4/5 vote would be <br />requir nu. <br />uirecLur matcher expressed concern in tying in the <br />berming and joint driveway with Donanza Restaurant, <br />who was the next scheduled public hearing, but who <br />was not present. He explained some modifications <br />would be requireu to the parking plan, and the berm- <br />ine would have to be shifted in order to properly <br />buffer the residents )rum the businesscs. llc stated <br />he understands Super America and bonanza are willing <br />to work together. He also explained there are some <br />questions yet on the right turn lane onto Highway 10, <br />and the highway department will be getting back to <br />him tnis week regarding the signal modifications. <br />Mr. Wistrom stated he felt the two pieces of property <br />should stand on their own two leas and be dealt with <br />separately. He stated they must cons.der that 3onanza <br />nay decide noL Lo go ahead, buL Lhey are pore than <br />willirg to work with them. <br />Mayor Linke stated he felt the two properties should <br />be dealt with separately. <br />Motion/Second: Quick!Blanchard to table until the <br />pro ems ran ae worked out with the berming between <br />Bonanza Restaurart and Super America. <br />2 aye, 3 i:ays <br />Councilmembers Hankner, Haake and Mayor Linke voted <br />against the motion, stating they felt the two <br />developments should be dealt with separately. <br />Motion/Second: Hankner/Haake to approve Resolution <br />No. 1921 for the conditional use permit for Super <br />America at the southwest corner of County Road I <br />and Highway 10, noting the findings as stated by <br />Attorney Meyers, contingent upon a letter of <br />agreement between Super America and Bonanza on the <br />common development issues and MnDOT signal light <br />approval and Ue agreement of Super America to <br />contribute up to $10,000 in value of services and/or <br />cash for the construction of the right turn lane <br />from County Road I to east bound Highway 10, and <br />signalization as required by MnDOT, and waive the <br />reading. <br />Motion Failed <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.