Laserfiche WebLink
NitMO TO: <br />FROM: <br />DATE: <br />SUBJk.CT. <br />t'LERk-ALMINf:'1'kATOR AND CITY COUNCO, <br />PUBLIC WORKS/COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR THATCHF.y/4 T <br />tK•Tttnl!K II, 19R5 <br />HORSE AND RIDER WESTERN WF.AR'S BILL FOR REPAIR OF <br />WATER SERVICE LINE <br />On .January 10, 19115 the C i I y rclw't i red lint -so and Rider's curb <br />stop and box. We did this because water was seeping out from the <br />ground around the curb stub box. we could not determine who was <br />responsible for the leakinq. Upon excavating the hole Staff <br />determined that the leaking was comin.l from the rather mangled <br />joints on both side: of the• curb stop and box. The top of the <br />curb box looked like it had been sheared off. Taking into <br />consideration the above information the only logical cause of <br />leaking joints on either side of the curb stop is that the curb <br />stop joints were damaged at the same time that the curb box was <br />sheared off. City Code, Chapter 70.03 states that maintenance <br />of the curb stop and box shall be that of the applicant, owner, <br />of occupint or other user of the premises and it. shall be <br />the responsibility o[� Warty ro maintain said equipment and pay <br />for the necessary relmir�. <br />Therefore, on May 9, 19K', the City sent. Ilorse and Rider a bill <br />in the amount of $1,590.L7. T�t price is high because there was <br />an extremely high water fabl &aea. The bill is clearly his <br />responsibility to pay. we gave him every opportunity to take a <br />look at t:ie palls that wove removed from the hole. I know he <br />received the bill becaus,• he caliod Councilmember Phyllis <br />Blanchard to discuss this bill and said that he thought h? <br />should only be responsible for half of the bill. I tried to <br />call him several timer after talking to Councilmember Blanchard <br />but he has not returned my phone calls. Finally, 1 called and <br />he answered the phone and we discussed this issua. we talked <br />about this on October 10, 1985 and I said that he was clearly <br />responsible for paying this bill. However, after much discusrion <br />I agreed to have a one day sale on his bill and that if he paid <br />his bill today, he could pay half the bill and 1 would take that <br />as full payment.. He said he would be by in a couple of hours to <br />pay the bill and he never showed up. <br />ag <br />On October 31, the City rer eived a check in the amoun of $795.14 <br />from Ilw ie and Rider with the statement "Paid In Full" on the <br />check. I plan to return the check to Horse and Rider stating that <br />he missed the half price stile by over two weeks and that he should <br />pay the full amount due pet my October 11, 1965 letter (letter <br />attached) o, we will be forced to matt procedures for shutting off <br />his water. I toel w,• should take this position because: <br />