My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1985/11/18
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1985
>
Agenda Packets - 1985/11/18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2025 3:13:48 PM
Creation date
3/26/2025 3:13:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
11/18/1985
Description
Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MEMO TO: CLERK -ADMINISTRATOR AND CITY COUNCIL <br />FROM: PUBLIC WORKS/COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR THATCHEyl%p T <br />DATE: OCTOBER 31, 1985 'QQ��' <br />SUBJECT: IIURSE AND I11DER WESTERN WEAR'S BILL FOR REPAIR OF <br />WATER SERVICE LINE <br />On January 10, 1985 the City repaired Horse and Rider's curb <br />stop and box. We did this because water was seeping out from the <br />ground around the curb stop box. We could not determine who was <br />responsible for the leaking. Upon excavating the hole Staff <br />determined that the leakinq was cominq from the rather mangled <br />3uinttun boUi sides ul III,, curb swp and box. The top of the <br />curb box looked like it had been sheared off.. Taking into <br />consideration the above information the only logical cause of <br />leaking joints on either side of the curb stop is that the curb <br />stop joints were damaged at the same time that the curb box was <br />sheared off. City Code, Chapter 70.03 states that maintenance <br />of the curb stop and box shall be that of the appliidnt, owner, <br />or occupant or other user of the premises and it shall be <br />the responsibility ofAparty to maintain said equipmen'_ and pay <br />for the necessary repairs. <br />Therefore, on May 9, 1985 the City sent Horse and Rider a bill <br />in the amount of $1,590.27. Thg price is high oecause there was <br />an extremely high water table area The bill is clearly his <br />responsibility to pay. We gave him every opportunity to take a <br />look at the narts that were removed from the hole. I know he <br />received the bill because he called Cout.cilmember Phyllis <br />Blanchard to discuss this bill end said that he thought he <br />should only be responsible for Calf of the bill. I tried to <br />call him several times after tal%ing to Councilmember Blanchard <br />but he has not returned my phone calls. Finally, I called ana <br />he answered the pnone and we discussed this issue. We talked <br />about this on October 10, 1985 and I said that he was clearly <br />responsible for paying this bill. However, after much discussion <br />I agreed to have a one day sale on his bill and that if he paid <br />his bill today, he could pay half the bill and I would take that <br />as full payment. He sail he would be by in a couple of hours to <br />pay the bill and he never showed up. <br />'905, <br />On October 31, the City received a check in the amount of $795.14 <br />from Horse and Rider with the statement "Paid In Full" on the <br />check. I plan to return the check to Horse and Rider stating that <br />he mibsed the half price sale by over two weeks and that he should <br />pay the full amount due per my October 11, 1985 letter (letter <br />attached) or we will be forced to start procedures for shutting off <br />his water. I feel we should take this position because: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.