My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1985/06/17
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1985
>
Agenda Packets - 1985/06/17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2025 3:31:07 PM
Creation date
3/26/2025 3:31:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
6/17/1985
Description
Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MEMO TO: Planning Commission / I <br />FROM: Director of Public Works/Community Devclopmen2 i0 7 <br />Public Works Foreman/Building Inspector <br />DATE: February 20, 1985 <br />SUBJECT: KRAUS-ANDERSON/SUPER AMERICA DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL <br />Attached are cover letters regarding the above noted proposal. <br />For approval of the proposal, the following items need to be <br />reviewed and approved by the City: <br />1. Rezoning from B-2 to B-3 <br />2. Conditional Use Permit for gasoline sales <br />3. Development review <br />4. Major Subdivision <br />The initial review of this is being given to you in memo form <br />because I believe the future development of the Silver Lake Woods <br />plat property along Highway 10 should be discussed by the Council <br />and the Developer. The P.U.D. approval for this property zoned <br />it B-2, Limited Business. The desire for the Highway 10 frontage <br />was for office and commercial shop usage. The City has already <br />amended its Zoning Ordinance from B-2 to B-3 Conditional Use I, <br />Permit <br />theger sameKing <br />typeFacility. <br />zoningThe <br />changes. America <br />Compproposal <br />for Plan <br />defends the B-2 usage. <br />City staff is not advocating denying the proposed request but does <br />feel the Developer should commit to developing theremainder of <br />the property B-2. Therefore, please take this opportunity <br />to <br />discuss this proposal as well as development of the remainder of <br />the Highway frontage. <br />The proposal itself, with minor modification, can meet City Code <br />requirements. A full staff review can be completed for your next <br />regular meeting. <br />/be <br />Attachments <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.