My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1985/06/17
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1985
>
Agenda Packets - 1985/06/17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2025 3:31:07 PM
Creation date
3/26/2025 3:31:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
6/17/1985
Description
Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mel and:; View PIaIuti ng Conmii s:;i a I /-`1 ri �,,,7 une 5, 11/H'. <br />Rep,ul,ir MeeLing age Two <br />--- -•------------------- ----------------------------------------- <br />Oh.:i:m,n: IFluuntin advised the Conmtissiuners ro proceed <br />gory I"1111ully an they would he setring; precedence if <br />they allowed the 1? lut.s, She staked she would .jusLify <br />II, but I? would be a gray area. <br />Mr. IIi:;In reminded Lhe Planning,, Commission they would <br />be rrduring the density with 12 single family homes <br />versus In twin humus. Ile staled Lhey hnve ample <br />square Im ahc in the area, it .just. must be averaged <br />out . <br />Ili root or Thl at -her pu i nt cd out: I hat had I he ;n'ca bceo <br />plonnod IN fferenlly from the start, Lhvy could have <br />held 12 units there, considering the total develop- <br />uuvu , but much ul the area has already been planned <br />and c""Aructed as a IVU. <br />'I'hur winal rout, of Kraus/Anderson, staled 11 wan their <br />feeling; that twin humus would not be attractive and <br />urged the Planning; Commission to accept Lhe 12 units, <br />as it would be a decrease in density and more <br />desirable. He added the uxisling home owners are <br />opposed 10 the twin hums cuneopL. <br />Mr. Ilaas sLated he knows of 15 residents of the <br />develupmenL who are opposed lu the twin home idea <br />d"d wi 11 he attending the Council meeting to voice <br />Iheir opinion. He also puinLed out that the PUU <br />allows for change as a development proceeds. <br />Commissioner Miller arrived at 7:59 PM. <br />After discussion among the Commissioners, it was <br />agreed that while Lhe Council is interested in <br />seeing it go to single family, the Planning; <br />Couuuission has mixed lee ling% on allowing; 12 <br />units, while 11 LIO Ls can be supported by the Code, <br />with variances fur 3 lots required for 11 lots, <br />buL a significant number more if 12 lots are <br />allowed. <br />Mr. Haas reemphasized that they meet rho require- <br />ments fur the luLs sires under the PUU wiLh the <br />oxreptiun of needing square footage variances for <br />H guts, but have the necessary total square footage. <br />He stated that Lhe 12 lots would be very buildable <br />lot a. <br />Chairulaa Mount in sLaLed she would like to see a <br />rennlulion wrilren out, using a mathematical <br />lornulla, speeifying; each lot. and what size it <br />would be and what variance would be required fur it. <br />Mr. Haan reminded the Planning, Commissioners that <br />they h;nl 111 r,ivv up an .ldditiunal 1/1' ripht of Way <br />.11ut1g, the e,ts1 still- ul i:ilver Lake Road, ;and laid <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.