My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1986/01/22
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1986
>
Agenda Packets - 1986/01/22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2025 3:44:18 PM
Creation date
3/26/2025 3:43:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
1/22/1986
Description
Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
103
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MEMO TO: Clerk-Adrlinistrator and City r'ounril <br />FROM: Director :f Public !I-v--1 I,. ,I <br />DATE: January 28, 198I1 <br />SUBJECT: HCRBS'r 6 >;ONS <br />Herbst 6 Sons roquented a meeting with the Pity council to <br />discuss the park dedication fee for their maj,lr suAlivi^ion. <br />Attached please find my in—mo dated November 7, 198',. Iflo <br />November 7, IW, •.immariar•s the appraisal pIII,-`.s flit Ihls <br />Subd l V is loll. <br />Herbst a Sons will present the following issucq at FU.nday'v <br />meet inq: <br />ISSUE it - Herbtir 6 Sons will say that the City "wrs them <br />ann�nrlmarely $7,000 hecause, they Instil lod the srwor line, <br />which runs from County Road H-2 to the Perkins Restaurant, <br />deeper that ner-sary so that .a lift station can he bypassed <br />dt bume time in iIte ful.ute. <br />Rebuttal - The c':ty's position is that just romp--n-ation was <br />q n to Herbst I. Sons for installing the suwel d.,elw•r than <br />necessary and that compensation was given to Herbst i Sons at <br />that time. The city cities not owo Herbst i Sons any type of <br />compensation at the present time. <br />ISSUE t2 - H.Irbsr 6 Sons will say that our apprnatser inrreaserf <br />their land vale.- hecauae of the proposed or potential land <br />sale across Highway IU. They will be referring to the <br />potential purchase of the Pinur.rest property by N c.R. <br />Comten. <br />Rebuttal - Tae CIty's Ippraist•r indiratod t, me that the <br />po_ential sale .t any !and near this site did riot inf!uence <br />his appraised v.tlue nt the Herbst a Sr•ns property. The <br />potential sale I4 the Pinecrent Property to N.C.R. Comten is <br />not reflected in his v,•lue of Herbst' land. <br />ISSUE 13 - Herb':t L Sono wtil say that the City is not taking <br />into account their appraisal. <br />Rebuttal - Theo, appra sal In not as detailed „r is ercurate <br />as our appraisal. A possible solution is to hIr a third <br />appraiser to review bl.th reports and deride which appraise: t� <br />more accurate. Our .appraiser is .•onfillent that his value will <br />stand up in court. <br />Again, I state that if Herbst i Sons, Inc. heleiv-r that the Boil <br />in the solithwust q.Iartar of their property Is poor and if they <br />want to prove to u-' that the soil is poor, they should feposit <br />money with the City and allnw u4 to hire a soil tusring firm to <br />conduct soil horror*: on their peopurty. The soil hnrings would <br />determine whether .t not huildings rnul.t he hnllt in the <br />southwest e. • ,I i ..pert e, <br />SWT/hac <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.