My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1986/02/10
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1986
>
Agenda Packets - 1986/02/10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2025 3:46:04 PM
Creation date
3/26/2025 3:46:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
2/10/1986
Description
Regular Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MEMO 'roi CLERK-\DMINISTRATOR AND CITY COUNCIL / <br />FROM: PI1HLI1 WORKS;COMMUNII'Y DEVELOPMFNf Uikt:c'rtlkzt / <br />DATE: FEBRUA,'Y 5, 1986 <br />SUBJECT: ENHERt: MINOR SUBDIVISION (1 lot into 2 lots) <br />PLANNING CASK: NO. 78-81 <br />Attached please find the following: <br />I. Resolution N,,. 1314 Apprr.vinq the Subdivision <br />dated .tune 22, 1981 <br />2. Letter to George Enberq from the City of <br />Mounds View dated June 30, 1981 <br />3. Surveyor Certificate <br />4. Plannimi Application dated January 28, 1986, <br />5. Mounds View Planning Commission Resolution <br />No. 152-85 dared February 5, 1986 <br />6. City Council Resolution No. 1979 dated <br />February 10, 1986 <br />The applicant received approval ro rezone his property from <br />R-1 to R-2 and subdivide the property in June, 1981. The <br />applicant had never bull' a dupiex on the subdivided iot. <br />In 1985 the applicant derided to buila a single-family house <br />on the subdivided lot. Building permits were issued, <br />construction commenced and has now been completed. The <br />problem is that M:. Enberg never filed the subdivision with <br />the County. City Code states that the applicant must record <br />the subdivisicn with the County within f0 days of approval <br />of the subdivision. I assume he did not file this with the <br />County because he did not want to pay the increase in <br />property taxes that would result from a subdivided <br />property. Therefore, he needs approval for the minor sub- <br />division. The rezoning from R-1 tc R-2 is a moot point <br />because he has already c,�nstructed a single-family house on <br />the lot. <br />The property is nor in a wetland or a floodplain zone. The <br />subdivision satistios all City Code requirements. <br />RECOMMENDATION: I recumwend approval of this min>r <br />subdivision. <br />SWT/mis <br />Attachments: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.