My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1986/02/18
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1986
>
Agenda Packets - 1986/02/18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2025 3:47:09 PM
Creation date
3/26/2025 3:47:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
2/18/1986
Description
Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MEMO TOi MAYOR V1D C 1 1 Y COUNCII. <br />FROM: CLERK-AUMINI�PRATOR <br />DATE: FEBRUAIiY S, 1986 <br />SUBJECT: CONTINGENCY PLAN FOR REDUCTION OF 1986 SLATE <br />AIDS <br />Attached to this memorandum please find a copy of a <br />memorandum from Finance Director Brager dared January 30, <br />1986 outlining the details of the governor's budget proposal <br />designed to respond to the expected revenue shortfall for <br />the state and an analysis of the Governor's proposals as it <br />relates to the contingency plan approved by the Council in <br />December of 1985. <br />Mr. Brager's memorandum indicates that based upon an Action <br />Alert from the Leaque of Minnesota Cities the City can <br />expect total reductions pursuant to the covernor's proposal <br />in the amount of $63,172. Mr. Brager makes the further <br />point that pursuant to news reports and statements made by <br />leoislative leader it is unlikely that the Legislature <br />will approve the Governor's proposal to reduce school aids <br />and mote than likely make larger reductions in the state <br />budget and local government aids in order to avoid any <br />reductions in school aids. Such a decision could bring the <br />total impact of reduction: to the City to a level nearly <br />equal with the $115,302 level currently contained in the <br />City's contingency plan. <br />Based on those preliminary findings, I have advised <br />department haads that a freeze has he-n placed on all <br />purchases curently contained within the city's contingency <br />plan. I would ask Council's concurrence with this order and <br />approvai of a request that I be authorized to approve <br />modifications to the contingency plan by individual <br />departments where an item currently contained in the plan is <br />replaced by an item contained within that department's <br />budget only which is equal in value. This would allow <br />uepartment heaps to reevaluate their budgets on an on -going <br />basis during the period of time that a decisi^n is nn;nn <br />made by the Legislature with regard to reductions in local <br />government aids thus avoiding a stagnation of the City's <br />efforts to provide the level of services expected by our <br />residents as well is undertaking actions to improve our <br />operations to the overall benefit of the community. <br />RECOMMENDATION: Staff would recommend that Council approve <br />the d:eecttoon-of the Clerk -Administrator to department heads <br />that a freeze is placed on all items currently contained <br />within the contingency plan outlined in the memorandums from <br />Finance Director Brager dated November 26, 1985 and <br />January 30, 1986 and authorize the Clerk -Administrator to <br />approve modifications to the plan whereby a department <br />substitutes an item currently contained within their 1986 <br />budget for an item of equal value contained within the <br />contingency plan. <br />DFP/mjs <br />Attachment: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.