Laserfiche WebLink
January 30, 1986 I <br />Page L <br />$8,165 more than ..is anticipate4. 'fhe ronrinyen / Plan contain, <br />a "Contingency" sl ,uld R„venue Sharing Funds not It., ret-vived. <br />One of those item was the purchase of only one or two squad car <br />budqeted for 1966. At the January 27, 1986 Council muting the <br />purrha•ie of two •:,Piad rots was ❑uthorixed. Thun 118,000 of that <br />$30,000 remains .,. tilahl.• to otlset Posslhle Sta1-• Ail <br />reductions. 1 pr ,pose that the followinq items It" addvd to the <br />City's Cnntingenr Plan until Surh time as the Leiiislature has <br />finalized the amp, it of .,ur Aid reductions for 14116: <br />Item Priority <br />100-140-47Ui I:leilIons, Equipment $9,uuu D <br />-eliminat.o purchase of ballot <br />counting equipment <br />100-120-4901 •ldminititration, r.ontingency $4,Uuo F. <br />-reduce operations contingency <br />100-360-470' Darks, Constnirtion $5,1)110 F <br />-eliminal: construction of outfield <br />fences ..t City Hall Park <br />Add.n,j tic above c-mf I.: the City's Contingency Pl.in mikes <br />$i15,302 availabl• for possible State Aid reductions. <br />Should the Goverm—'s budget proposal and rnrresp-„idinq <br />reductions be imp;omente,l approximately $63,172 of hudget <br />reductions would he necessary. The following items as ouLlined <br />r <br />in the Contingency Plan would have to be implemented: <br />Ilse of all R•venue 6hariog Funos ';38,165 <br />All A Priority reductions 22,147 <br />The tollowin.i B Priority reductions: <br />P 6 R Comoissions recording secretary 840 <br />Graphics -,rd for Iom Personal rnmputor 490 <br />Cable TV -•quipmeot cabinet I,000 <br />New carpeting for Polico Department 570 <br />Total 8 Ptiority reductions 2,86U <br />Total redu,:tions 563,172 <br />A balance of $52,110 remains available in the event of further <br />reductions in Loc.,! Government Aids and/or Homest,•.id Credits <br />payable to the City in 1986. <br />At this time infor.9ation provided by the mows medlt indicates <br />that many legislal.rrs are opposed to the Governor's proposal to <br />reduce School Aid to „,ive the State's revenue sh.irtfalI. <br />Should 1986 School Aids not be reduced it is most likely that th <br />shortfall will be resolved by further red,lcing th,• amnunt of Aid <br />to Cities. <br />