Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council �i �' ,� February i <br />Regular Meeting Page Two <br />---------------------------------------------------------------------- <br />Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed the purpose of 7. Consid. <br />proposed Resolution No. 1974, which speaks against of Rslt. <br />the consolidation of thc Ramsey County Municipal Court 1974 <br />system without further study dnd analysis. <br />Motion/Second: Quick/iiankner to approve Resolution <br />No. 1974, opposing the consolidation of the Ramsey <br />County Municipal Court system without further study <br />and analysis, and waive the reading. <br />5 ayes 0 niys <br />Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained the purpose of <br />Ordinance 404 is to bring the City into compliance <br />with the provisions of Minnesota law relating to the <br />timelines for filing for candidacy for local office. <br />Motion/Second: Blanchard/Quick to have the sec3nd <br />reading and adoption .f Ordinance No. 404, amending <br />Chapter 4, Section 4.02 of thu Home Rule Charter of <br />the City of Mounds View. <br />L'ouncijmembrr quick - aye <br />Councilmembcr Haake - aye <br />Councilmember Hankner - aye <br />Councilmeml,:r Blanchard - aye <br />Mayor Linke - aye <br />Motioi. ,i <br />8. Second Rcadinq <br />and Adeptu.� <br />of Ord. No. 40 <br />Motion C. �d <br />Clerk/Administrator Pauiey explained that, per Council's 9. Conside, — I <br />direction, Staff had prepared an ordinance renewing of orainanc_ <br />Ordinance No. 390, exte.,ding the effective date as No. 405 <br />far as State statute allows, which is 18 months. <br />Motion Second: Hankner/Quick to have the first <br />rea ing of Ordinance No. 405, renewing Ordinance <br />No. 390 prohibiting de-elopmentof certain properties <br />on an interim basis. <br />5 ayes 0 nays <br />Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained that because of <br />the lawsuit the City has going on concerning the <br />Master Plan, Staff wouli recommend that the Council <br />request the Metropolitan Council not approve the <br />MAC's proposed 1986-87 capita'. improvement program <br />until such time as the issues outlined in the City's <br />lawsuit with the Metropolitan Council and MAC are <br />resolved. <br />It was the concensus of the Council to follow <br />staff's recommendation. <br />Motion Carried <br />10. Consideration <br />of Memo Regar <br />ing MAC's <br />1986-87 Capit <br />Improvements <br />Program <br />