Laserfiche WebLink
UNAPPROVED <br />Mounds View City Council March 24, 1986 <br />Regular Meeting Page Four <br />------------------------------------------------------------ <br />Director Thatcher reviewed the history 13. Consideration <br />of the Gale/Yost property and stated of Rslt. No. <br />that the City has not yet been reimbursed 1980 <br />for their costs, and recommended assessing <br />the costs to the property. <br />Motion/Second: Quick/Hankner to approve <br />Resolution No. 1980. assessing the City's <br />cost of preparing plans and specifications and <br />bidding the proiect twice for Public Improve- <br />ment No. 84-5 for property known as the Gale/ <br />Yost Addition, and waive the reading. <br />5 ayes 0 nays <br />Uirector Thatcher had no report. <br />Attorney Meyers had no report. <br />Motion <br />Carried <br />14 Report of <br />Public Works/ <br />Community <br />Dvlpt. Dir. <br />15. Report of <br />Attorney <br />Councilmember Haake expressed concern 16. Report of <br />in the lack of interest by the citizens Council- <br />ir, attending agenda sessions and the fact members <br />that sc much discussion goes on at them that <br />the public is then not aware of. She suggested <br />possibly combining the agenda sessions into the <br />regular meetings, which are better attenc'ed and <br />have formal minutes taken. <br />Councilmember Fiaake also asked for the status <br />and outcome of the City's neeting with MAC the <br />previous week. <br />Mayor Linke stated the City was successful in <br />meeting with MAC and getting them to agree to <br />consider moving the north/scuth runway 2,500 feet <br />to the north and removing an equal amount of <br />existing pavement from the south end. He stated <br />it is contingent upon the environmental impact <br />statement (EIS), and the City's acceptance of that. <br />He added that the City has since requested they <br />amend the EIS to look at moving the runway 2500' to <br />the north. <br />Attorney Meyers stated they have approached MAC on <br />the segmented EIS issue in the past, and the City <br />has consultants prepared to study MAC's proposal, once <br />it is received. He added it is not necessary to do the <br />entire Master Fian over. <br />1 <br />0 <br />