My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1980/02/28
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1980
>
Agenda Packets - 1980/02/28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/31/2025 12:36:35 PM
Creation date
3/31/2025 12:32:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
2/28/1980
Description
Regular Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SHORT-TI INC. <br />CONSULTING ENGINEERS <br />NI. 1'At!1 %I1%N1N(.IF % ( IIII-I'LAVA IA1 LS, VVIS( ONSIN <br />February 6, 1980 RE: MOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA <br />SILVER VIEW PARK/OAK LAKE PARK ADDN. <br />OUR FILE NO. 77039 <br />city of Mounds view <br />2401 highway #10 <br />Mounds view, Minnesota 55112 <br />Attention: Bruce Anderson, <br />City Parks Director <br />Gentlemen: <br />As requested by city staff at a meeting with Bruce Anderson and <br />Daniel Boxrud on January 31, 1980, we herein submit our proposal <br />to review the proposed Kraus-Anderson/City Park Development in <br />the vicinity of the Scotland Green Apartments. Our understanding <br />of the work required is as follows: <br />1. Evaluate the developers proposals relative to sound <br />engineering practice and conformance with the resolution <br />#983. <br />2. Assess the feasibility of constructing the proposed lake, <br />bike trail, related sliding hill, and the possibility of <br />constructing these facilities at the proposed cost limit <br />of $250,000. <br />3. Recommend features to be considered as part of the develop- <br />ment which would be desirable or required from the city's <br />standpoint. <br />4. Approximate the likely maintenance that will be required <br />of the lake due to incoming sediment load from storm <br />water, possible shoreline erosion, etc. <br />5. Address the proposed lake as to it's suitability as a <br />swimming beach and recommend features or facilities to <br />maintain the proper water quality including but not limited <br />to possible filtration systems. <br />We have been in contact with the developers engineer. The engineer <br />indicates that the final design proposal is still under development <br />and will not be submitted for about one week. Therefore, we can <br />zw HIt15BOROEIGH OfHCI H1DG • 2353 RICE STRfII • ST. PAt 1, NUNN[NOTA 55111 0 P)IONE 1612) 4b4•0272 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.