Laserfiche WebLink
between these devices, they have often been <br />confused by laymen and professionals alike. The <br />unfortunalc result I�as been ilim the whole plan- <br />ning process has suffered, and in some cases, the <br />zoning process has broken down entirely. It <br />cannot be emphasized enough that it is very <br />important for a community to follow the correct <br />zoning procedures. Many communities in the past <br />have learned the hard way the results of not <br />following the correct procedures and have lost <br />important challenges in the courts to their zoning <br />dcus:ons. With this in mind, the following is an <br />explanation of these various administrative devices. <br />Zoning Amendment (Rezoning) <br />The main purpose of the zoning amendment is <br />to alluw the community to change the zoning <br />ordinance or map. There are two basic types of <br />amendments. One is a zoning map amendment or <br />a change in the geographical area of a zoning <br />district which is also popularly known as rczuning. <br />The other is a change in the zoning text, or changes <br />in what is permitted io a particular zoning district. <br />ordinance was developed and adopted. to mos <br />planning programs, minor errors wi:l often be made <br />which are overlooked at the time of adopting the <br />comprehensive plan or zoning ordinance. To <br />correct these errors, lire zoning amendment pro- <br />cedure would be applicable. <br />Finally, rezonings (or changes in district lines) <br />arc often desired and appropriate in "staged <br />growth" plans which make use of "holding zones." <br />For example, a typical holding zone in a staged <br />growth plan may be a reianvcly large area de- <br />signated for agriculture. It is recognized that as <br />growth moves out into the rural areas that some of <br />these agricultural areas will be re -zoned for re- <br />sidential or commercial uses at such time that <br />utilities can be extended or services provided to <br />bring shout ordcdy development, It should be <br />noted that the staged growth approach has not yet <br />been tested in the courts in Minnesota although <br />this approach to planning has been upheld in the <br />highest court in New York State <br />Having discussed generally the rationale and <br />theory for zoning amendments, two problem areas <br />There arc a numher of rrasons why a com- dealing with zoning amendments need to be <br />mumty may want to amend the zoning ordinance. discussed at further length. One is spot zoning and <br />One is to reflect a significant and unanticipated the other is down zoning. <br />change in the community brought about through <br />rapid changes in technology, or urban Jevelopm - S orS or +nnrng Spot zoning has been fin as <br />or social behavior. In today's rapidly changin the rezo��tg O a single parcel of land cur a relative - <br />world, n is virtually impossible to predict future ly small area for higher intensity use than the <br />world, <br />development beyond a 5-i0-year period with any surroundinq the parlieular parcela,Mand. U�Suall <br />degree of accuracy. For this reason, it is recog- spot zoning involves an individua p'reel <br />nized by most planning professionals that the singled out for special and privileged treatment <br />comprehensive plan should be updated at least primarily for the benefit of the landowner and not <br />every 3.5 years to reflect these changes. Since in accord v;th the comprehensive plan. For <br />zoning should be teased on the comprehensive plan, example, the rezoning of a single parcel of land in <br />the ordinance should be amended when the com- a residential area for commercial or industrial uses <br />prehensive plan is updated, which arc not compatible with the surrounding <br />land uses or in conformance with the compre <br />t be <br />A second reason is to reflect changes in policy <br />by the community. This may come about in a <br />variety of different ways. For example, certain <br />planning policies and programs may not be bring- <br />ing about the desired goals which may necessitate a <br />change in development policies. Or development <br />in adjacent communities may affect the com- <br />munity in such a way as to require changes in <br />development policy. For example, a state or <br />county highway department may determine to <br />locale a major highway through or adjacent to a <br />community which obviously will have a substantial <br />effect on develonment. <br />A thirJ reason is to correct mistakes which were <br />made at the time the comprehensive plan or zoning <br />hensivc plan is usually held by tico courts <br />illegal in that it amounts to spot zoning. In the <br />absence of a comprehensive plan, it is more dif- <br />ficult to determine whether a particular rezoning <br />amounts to spot zoning. <br />Spot zoning usually results when the local <br />officials are too liberal in the granting of requested <br />.oning amendments. There may be many reasons <br />why a property owner may want rezoning or a <br />zoning amendment, some of which are legitimate <br />but some of which are not in relation to the <br />community planning process. For example, a <br />property owner may want a rezoning to enhance <br />the opportunities of selling his land, or to gam a <br />competitive, locatiunal advantage with a business <br />10G - <br />