Laserfiche WebLink
LMCIT: Questions &answers <br />by Peter Tritz <br />As a result of the increased cost <br />and dif(cully in obtaining insur- <br />mie aver the past couple of years, <br />a large number of cities have <br />joined the Leaguc of Minnewla <br />Cities Insurance Trust for the first <br />time. Over 6M cities now partici- <br />pate in LMCIT's workem' compen- <br />sation program: the property/ <br />casually program now numliers <br />more than 900. But while the <br />majority of cities in Minnesota are <br />nnw covered through LICIT, many <br />people don't really understand <br />what 131CIT is and how It works. <br />This a,licle will answer wine of <br />the most common nuestions about <br />I'MCIT. <br />Our city his been in UICiT for <br />several rears. This rear, the premium <br />that LbICIT charged far proprriy and <br />habditi, coverage ncarlr doubled. A <br />IMC IT taking advantage of its status <br />as the only game in town to gouge <br />cars) <br />Some people have suggested that <br />because there are very few d any other <br />places for cities to get coverage, <br />LMCIT is taking the opportumty to <br />make a lot of money by charging unrea. <br />sonably high premiums. This is simply <br />nil the case. In fact, it would be <br />pointless for I.MCIT intentionally to <br />charge more than what is needed to <br />cover the losses. <br />LMCIT is nothing more than a coop. <br />erative orgrnneatirn of crimes. Il is in a <br />probhnakmg entity. Supp><e LMCIT's <br />charges are tin high: that is, suppose <br />flat the premiums are more than w1w <br />LMCIT needs to cover tit• pri gram's <br />expenses and :he member -incurred <br />boswc The result would he that I \ICIT <br />wind have some surplus funds. There <br />are really only two things LMCIT can di) <br />with lint surplus — enho ictwo it to <br />the rites as a dividend or retain it as a <br />teserve. enabhog LMCIT to retain more <br />risk in the future, koivering the ust of <br />remsuranC and thug the CItsi la Cities <br />for the future. Either way. a direct <br />savings to cities results. in a c nventorul <br />prate tsurance company, dose surplus <br />funds would botonvi ornfils for Jr com- <br />n'tnv's strrklx,dcrs. <br />.tio a'hi fix/ die c.-w yr, up? <br />Several factors have led to the <br />Increase in cost. One of the expenses <br />which LMCIT mats: pay out of the <br />geprinnea rrom aacxy rvmuntam news. <br />prenuum dollar is the cost of remsur- <br />anre. LNCIT buys "specific excess" <br />reinsurance to protect against the prn- <br />sibdity of a Urge catastrophic kiss. <br />LMCIT also buys ''aggregate excess" <br />reinsurance to protect against the pos- <br />sibility that the total losses in a year <br />night exceed the funds LMCIT has <br />avadable to pay those kisses, <br />Tv'o things happened in LNCIT's <br />last renewal with the reinsurers. First, <br />the price of the remsurance was high <br />— substantalhy higher than L11CIT <br />anticipated. This additional cost must <br />be reflected in the premiums i-MCIT <br />charges. Second, the reinsurers ins <br />isted an a relatively high ''attachment <br />point" for the aggregate coverage. <br />(The "attachment point" is the point <br />at Mikh to aggregate reinsurane <br />bcgtns to pay; if LMCIT's total losses <br />for the vear were to exceed the aua-h- <br />n,ent point, the aggregate remsuranm <br />would cover those excess kisses. up to <br />the limits of the aggregate reinsurance <br />policy ) The attachment print is high <br />cough that after paying exlxmses. <br />I,\ICIT would not have enough funds <br />renatmng from the premmm to full) <br />,over I.MCIT's potential lability up to <br />IM• ati at li nrnt pint. To fund this gap. <br />I.NCIT is charging each member a <br />"reserve assessment" equal to 10 <br />perceal of the premium. <br />Aside from the reinsurance costs. <br />the level of losses from prevxus rears <br />also affected rates. particularly for lia- <br />bility coverage. Incurred lubddy losses <br />and the costs of attorneys' fees to <br />defend labduv claims have been higher <br />than pnifected. One of the problems in <br />providing IUbility coverage is that it <br />takes several years before you really <br />know whether the :ates charged were <br />vpproprate. LMCIT is still receiving <br />new claims for incidents which <br />occurred in 1980. nearly sot years ago. <br />The costs of paying and defending <br />liability claims incurred In previous <br />rears have exceeded the premiums <br />collected for habibty coverage for those <br />years. Thus. premiums have had to <br />increase to get them in line with what <br />LMCIT's actual loss experience shows <br />they shookd he <br />II'hen all is said and done. though. <br />isn't LAIC -IT just another insurance <br />connparli,) <br />No. LMCIT is not an insurance <br />company at all: it is a cnopera0ve pomt <br />powers orgamzatmn, which the item• <br />her cows themselves own and control <br />LMU I operates under statutes which <br />Allow , ors to organue -pools - A pool <br />is simply a nxv'hamsm for sharing risk <br />Among cites. LSICIT's governing body <br />1 <br />J <br />April IOM u <br />