My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1986/07/07
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1986
>
Agenda Packets - 1986/07/07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/1/2025 1:55:19 PM
Creation date
4/1/2025 1:55:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
7/7/1986
Description
Work / Executive Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MAYOR AND CITY "OUNC11, <br />PAGE. FOUR <br />JUNE 30, 1986 <br />K <br />address the concerns of the City that any development occurring <br />along Highway 10 not have a negative impact upon residential <br />properties immediately adjacent to that development. Their <br />recommendations include the installation of buffering between, any <br />commercial development along Highway 10 and the residential <br />properties to mitigate any negative impacts that might result <br />from the commercial development. <br />The fourth and f inal finding of the Planning <br />t offer a Commission <br />states <br />that the Wuornns Report, "... <br />ve <br />solutions;". Mr. Wuornns and his associates were charged to <br />perform a study of Planning Districts 6 and 12 and specifically <br />that area fronting upon Highway 10 and recommend appropriate land <br />uses and development controls in those areas. It would appear <br />from the conclusion contained in the mornos Report that it waS <br />their professional opinion that no acceptahle alternative <br />solutions were available. <br />The Planning Commission in their report does reach the following <br />conclusions as a result of the information and recommendations <br />contained in the Study and their discussions. <br />1. "Development controls must be reviewed and strengthened <br />to minimize impacts created by more intense land uses <br />adjacent to residential property." During the past two <br />years it has been generally agreed upon by all parties <br />involved, i.e., City Council, Planning Commission and <br />Staff that a comprehensive review and update of the <br />Comprehensive Plan is in order. In recent months it <br />has, in fact, become clear as noted by the Planning <br />Commission, that all of the City's development controls <br />;Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code, Subdivision Code, <br />etc.) are in need of an update based upon current <br />conditions. This update will require the expenditure of <br />funds to employ consultants having the expertise not <br />available on the Staff to coordinate this effort. <br />2. "Traffic circulation and access to commercial property <br />must be controlled to facilitate safe and convenient <br />access that does not impact adjacent residential uses." <br />As can be noted in the Wuornns Report, great emphasis <br />has been placed on the buffering of commercial uses from <br />Adjacent property. <br />3. "Current zoning uses listed under our present various <br />commercial zones may he too broad in scope to contrcl." <br />Not only may our various commercial zones he too broad, <br />some of the uses may he considered to be altogether <br />undesireable and these uses should be eliminated from <br />the code as part of the overall review recommended in 11 ` <br />above. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.