Laserfiche WebLink
tl11t,11%-, 3 <br />MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY CUU L <br />FROM: CLERK-ADMINISTRAI'UR - <br />DATE: MAY 2, 1985 <br />SUBJECT: MOUNDS VIEW K STATION <br />City Attorney Richard Meyers, Public Wnrks/Community <br />Development Director Steve Thatcher and I recently met to <br />discuss the proposal by the Mounds View K Station on Highway <br />10 to remodel their facilities and the recommendation of the <br />City Planning Commission which included a recommendation to <br />revise the City's Comprehensive Plan. We are concerned that <br />any effort on the Dart of the City to oiecu-meal amend the <br />imp <br />that it is necessary that the City undertake app <br />evaluations of the Comprehensive Plan to determi <br />or not modifications of the Plan are appropriate <br />to implement said modifications. <br />he <br />We feel <br />ropriate <br />ne whether <br />and, if so, <br />In order to provide the City with appropriate time to under- <br />take a study of the Comprehensive Plan and make any <br />necessary modifications, it will he necessary for the City <br />to implement some type of a moratorium on developm.,;-nt in <br />those areas where conflict currently exists. Minnesota <br />Statute 462.355 Subdivision 4, copy attached, provides that <br />a municipality may adont an interim ordinance applicable to <br />all or part of its jurisdiction for the purpose of <br />protecting the planning process and health, safety and <br />welfare of its citizens by regulating, restricting or <br />prohibiting any use, development, or subdivision within the <br />jursidiction or a portion thereof for a period not to exceed <br />one year from the effective date of an ordinance if the City <br />is rord, irring planning ehudips. Staff wnuld r®rnmmend that <br />the Council adopt an interim ordinance prohibiting develop- <br />ment and subdivision of property fronting on Highway 10 in <br />planning districts 6 and 12, copy of map attached, for the <br />purpose of performing a study to re-evaluate the provisions <br />of the City's Comprehensive Plan regarding future <br />development of property frontinr, on Highway 10 in those <br />planning districts with the ordinance to expire 90 days <br />after its adoption. <br />Should the Councii agree with this recommiendation Staff <br />would be prepared to present an interim ordinance for its <br />first reading at the May 13, 1985 Council Meeting. ' <br />DFP/mjs <br />Attachement: <br />