My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1986/09/15
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1986
>
Agenda Packets - 1986/09/15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/1/2025 2:32:16 PM
Creation date
4/1/2025 2:32:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
9/15/1986
Description
Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
162
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
.. MRMn fill Ilyu;llllic nenignf•r:: <br />Page 3 <br />tiarch 31, 1903 <br />Phosphorus Assi.ulilal.ion Callac.i.Ly Per. 36.4 pounds <br />v Year <br />in 1.979 Lhr, applicant. regnerted approval Lo fill a portion or the <br />wetland. Approval was given but. the development• agreement was never <br />compleLely r.xrenl.ed nad suhrrgnenL.ly wan wil.hdrawn by ap,•'..icanL•. <br />Prior U.) wi.l.hdrawai.or. applical;i.on, ri.il. was placed on L' 'lots in <br />qur. L•.i.on. This rill altered Lite weL•land as follows! <br />Redncrd Total WCLland Area by: 0.210 acres <br />Reduced 'rol:al Wetland SLorage 0,203 acre-feet. <br />Vul.unlc by: <br />Reduced Phosphorus Ass.im.ilaL•i.on 2.52 pounds <br />Capacity Per Year by: <br />lssucs to be Resolved <br />u Should the wetland boundary he changed Lo conform with existing <br />Lopo? <br />�?,e' n siLes support Lwo rourplex bu.i.l.di.ngs or should provisions <br />pI(efii 4n.06, Subdi.v.i.sion 4 (A) (1) be exercised? <br />3. Tito "ex.isLi.ng dry-bui.ldahle" (recent rill) is entirely within <br />the loo font wetland buffer aren, thcrerore, a setback variance <br />--J will be necessary. _ <br />7 a <br />V Applicant proposes to Ill an addLti.on�1 0.250 to 0.28ce s <br />of wetland. Will this be allowed? <br />5. Site .is in fl.00dplai.n an•1, therefore, will. require ccnd.itl.unal <br />lisp. lint -mil. for. additional Lill. Pill will result in rise of <br />100 year., 24 hoar r.lood level, therefore, is contrary to 49.04, <br />Subdivision 3(1 and W. <br />g,J Pruposal.anLic.ipaLes using the wela and to meet some of the deten- <br />tion requi.relnents or Chapter 49A (Resuluiion No. 903). <br />7. What- is Hie, nr.xl step in review process? <br />I) Refer. to Planning Commission. <br />b) Act: on some issunr and rafr_r hr.:ance to Planning <br />Colllllliss.i OII. <br /><:) Reject Appl.ical:i.on. <br />The above review cammetlLs were prepared after consultation with <br />Attorney Meyers. <br />ac.1/be <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.