My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1986/10/06
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1986
>
Agenda Packets - 1986/10/06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/1/2025 2:35:16 PM
Creation date
4/1/2025 2:35:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
10/6/1986
Description
Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
132
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
UM JLN DEVELOPMENT, INC. <br />1045 Rirr Slrrrl <br />RO. Rar 13292 <br />Si. Paid, AN 55113 <br />6121487-3619 <br />Mr. Donald F. Pauley <br />Clerk - Administrator <br />City of Mounds View <br />2401 Highway 10 <br />Mounds View, MN 55112 <br />Re: Development proposal for <br />located within the City <br />by County Road II-2, U.S. <br />35W <br />Dear Don: <br />July 9, 1986 <br />approximately 50 acres of property <br />of Mounds View, bounded generally <br />Highway 10, and Interstate highway <br />Please accept my apology for the tardiness of my response <br />to our meeting of June 9, 1986. The delay is attributable to a <br />�^ variety of factors but should not be construed as a lack of /�- <br />interest on our part. JLN Development remains very enthusiastic <br />about the project, and we are now prepared to proceed as quickly <br />as applicable procedures will permit. <br />At our recent meeting we discussed two general areas <br />related to the project. The matters discussed, anP our response, <br />is summarized below. <br />1. Site Plan <br />In connection with the preliminary site plan which we <br />presented, you advised that the City was generally <br />satisfied but would oppose any access to the site from <br />County Road H-2. Since our meeting we have re- <br />evaluated the site plan to determine project feasibility <br />without -access to County Road H-2. While we understand the <br />City's concern and while we are prepared to take every <br />reasonable step to mitigate the impact of the development <br />on the surrounding neighbors, we fee:. that effective <br />development of the site can occur only with access to the <br />project from County Road H-2. As you know, we are con- <br />sidering a significant development which will involve over <br />600,000 square feet of improved space, and more than 50 <br />acres of. land. The prohibition of access to County Road H-2 <br />would, in our judgment, prevent effective development of J <br />the site and cf,uld impair project feasibility. <br />REA1 RSTATF DEVELOPAMN7' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.