My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1986/11/03
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1986
>
Agenda Packets - 1986/11/03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/1/2025 2:40:04 PM
Creation date
4/1/2025 2:40:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
11/3/1986
Description
Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
149
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
LUFF.T-4. Transportation (F) <br />11 <br />An efficient transportation system is a vital element in planning for the <br />fiscal, economic, and social development at state, regional, and local levels. <br />Since the agricultural and recreational economy of the state and its cities are <br />long-rangeuhighlway needsrtoeassureithe vitality ofsthe state'sreconomy. <br />Y• <br />B g g Y <br />Furthermore, environmental concerns and the need to conserve energy require <br />n be utilized in meeting the diverse needs <br />that alternate modes of transportatio <br />which exist in various rnmmunities and regions of the state. In order to <br />provide a more adequate state governmental structure and funding mechanism for <br />transportation system planning and development, the League recommends that the <br />foIlowinG changes be made: <br />1. Turnbacks. The state Highway Study commission has been studying the <br />possibility of ays in <br />to <br />riate <br />classifications rand ajurisdiction. rTile wincestatea <br />increased cost for cities ptopassumeLL3e <br />responsibility for general maintenance and life cycle treatment far exceeds the <br />. For this reason, no wholesale program <br />current financial capacities of cities <br />of highway turnbacks should be instituted at this time. <br />instead, existing mechanisms for the orderly turnback of roads should he <br />fine tuned, including increasing the level of funding in the municipal turnback <br />accoun, and ations or <br />s by road <br />t unlesstprohibiting <br />a hearingisheld and ltile rroad al eiscbrought upttonits kauthorities <br />normal maintenance <br />standards before the revocation is effective. <br />other changes needed to facilitate turnbacks include: <br />a) State aid rules should be changed to allow counties to upgrade county <br />state aid highways using c.s.a.h. funds prior to turnback with city concurrence <br />and without penalty as currently imposed by the rules; <br />b) Tile League supports use of a portion of the highway motor vehicle excise <br />tax to provide an adequate source for turnback funds, and; <br />c) The League supports allowing cities to determine if a turnback road will <br />be designated as a state -aid road or local street and if the city chooses to <br />designate the road as a state -aid road this designation should not affect the <br />standard designation process so that developing cities will be able to continue <br />to designate a percentage of new road growth as part of the state -old system. <br />2. An adequate levelof highway user funds should be awin'.ained so that <br />highway maintenance and reconstruction may be continued, and adequate funds be <br />available for the state -aid street program. <br />3. The League supports the continued dedication of the sales tax on motor <br />vehicle sales for transportation purposes, and advocates the prompt transfer of <br />the motor vehicle excise tax into the highway user and transit assistance fund. <br />-35- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.