My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1986/11/03
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1986
>
Agenda Packets - 1986/11/03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/1/2025 2:40:04 PM
Creation date
4/1/2025 2:40:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
11/3/1986
Description
Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
149
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
LUEET-5. Ground and Surface Water Management (B) <br />In order to safeguard the public health and the environment it is necessary <br />to plan and manage our water resourceu as a valuable state resource. Many <br />watershed districts, counties, cities, and towns have done a good job of dealing <br />with surface and groundwater management issues and have the authority and <br />ability to continue to do so in a cost-effective manner. These existing <br />mechanisms should continue to be used to the greatest extent possible to address <br />surface and groundwater management problems instead of establishing a new system <br />or creating new organizations. <br />Local units of government should retain the basic responsibility for <br />surface water management as they are the level of government closest to the <br />problem. In 1982, legislation required local governments in the metropolitan <br />area to adopt surface water run-off controls and regulations; 1985 legislation <br />encourages similar steps to be taken in the non:-metrupolitan area of the state. <br />These statutes should be given sufficient time to work before additional <br />programs or extensive changes to existing programs are enacted by the <br />Legislature. The possibility of intergovernmental conflict should be studied <br />and dispute resolution mechanisms should be reevaluated. <br />The Legislature should provide funds to further encourage counties to <br />undertake water planning activities, and these state funds should be made <br />available to cities that are required to make substantial amendments to local - <br />plans and controls, or that are employed to assist the county in preparation of <br />the comprehensive water plan. Special levies should also be made available to <br />fund water management projects. <br />-31- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.