My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1986/12/15
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1986
>
Agenda Packets - 1986/12/15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/1/2025 2:43:37 PM
Creation date
4/1/2025 2:43:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
12/15/1986
Description
Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
z <br />The city needs to continue to address these important issues. <br />i <br />in sumnar, <br />d a <br />ty <br />® improvingyits hteam twork eand ws rwhich ehad aineed which <br />t hrefine, consolidahad made reat rogress in <br />te, and <br />improve its planning process. <br />The consultants concluded from these interviews that the workshop agenda <br />(see attached) should include a review of last year emphasizing the successes <br />and the causes for those successes; a clarification by the council of the <br />city's psi^;':'yes for the next few years; a presentation by the staff of what they <br />need from council to•achieve their goals and objectives; and an agreement by <br />department heads and council members as to how the planning and budget process <br />will be scheduled for this coming year. <br />A Review of 1984; Reasons for Success <br />New Brighton enjoyed considerable success in 1984. The important question to <br />ask is what caused this success? Excellence in local government is not a <br />product but a process, a pursuit, which can be understood and thereby sustained. <br />In a handout provided workshop participants entitled "Excellence in Local <br />Government Management"*eight criteria are identified which distinguish successful <br />local governments from less successful ones. They include having an action <br />orientation, being oriented toward employees, staying close tcitizens, <br />i <br />explicitly stating values, mission, goals, and competence, mantaining an <br />efficient task -centered structure, and nurturing stable and yet creative <br />political relationships. <br />In reviewing 1984, the department heads and council identified the following' <br />® successes and their causes. The similarity between the causes that were <br />identified and the criteria mentioned above is striking. <br />Successes Causes for Success <br />Liquor Store operation was turned around *'New Management <br />and is showingprofit * Employee Attitude <br />a * Direct Mail Marketing <br />* Economy <br />The April Tornado was handled well *Attitude to pitch in and help <br />by city staff, residents, <br />employees <br />*Management response, planning <br />and organization <br />Pipeline problem was Handled well *Professional and dedicated staff*Personnel <br />Computer Selection made *Council stayed out of details <br />*Patience and hard work by staff <br />*Use of consultants <br />*Material developed by the Center for Excellence in Local Government, <br />Palo Alto, California. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.