My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1988/10/10
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1988
>
Agenda Packets - 1988/10/10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/9/2025 10:50:37 AM
Creation date
4/9/2025 10:50:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
10/10/1988
Description
Regular Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ftunds vie <br />Regular MeetinCity Council F"; v1 ._ {r_,e,�+�o <br />Cou -- ----9------ -----ij-tJ�_� C� �G October 10, 198 ncilmemb - V c_ D page Four 8 <br />er Hanknec explained ___ <br />met on two occasions so far, both --- ------------ <br />zational meetings. the Task Force has this Tuesda She added of which were only <br />thiA point y evening, but y are not well tinani- <br />the be meeting <br />to the <br />explained the a substantive not geared up at <br />g Will be reviewing Council review She further <br />that if the 9 It tOgether. pShening Commission <br />public hearing - too also Pointed out <br />issues - reached spread out, by the <br />that should have they are time the <br />surfaced )Oat hearing about <br />Jim Sandid earlier. <br />9 7817 Bona Road, reviewed what <br />was the process of events, which he <br />ht <br />City was following L•his he thou <br />tima. did noL• believe gthe <br />City planner Herman again <br />been presented to the Planninlained the propoaal had <br />and was listed on their a 5 Commission <br />Benda, on October 5 <br />Mr. Sand' <br />dge ated <br />ue <br />bein <br />was <br />tosbe a awfulump veryerned quicklnother wetland <br />n awful on this. <br />getting information on Y and there <br />it. He added the seems <br />COuncilmember Y are not <br />allowej <br />theankner notethat d <br />no natter how much <br />is <br />the Council <br />enough or accused time <br />Ms. A gh information time. °f not giving <br />Yaz stated she felt the <br />confusing as she did <br />setting the agenda for to was <br />Nublie hearingsee the correlation very <br />'Is. Krough s * and receivingbetween <br />ta_ed the EAW, <br />Task Force was set she thought <br />She stated give the Environmental Quality <br />advance to the, should to glue expertise t� the stud have this information a cOu;:cil. <br />in <br />request somethin She also asked if <br />notad Barr g for the a residentycould <br />the wetland Task Force t° <br />c&tegorzc ordinance, nndwhich eenPaid to 3o a studydo- ShA ofdo that- and the wetlands, and she they suggested the <br />make it a top prior? urged the City <br />Task Farce <br />Counc.ilmember <br />Of dath <br />ys Har:kner explainqueshed <br />everyone lonwtheh a eForce. must beedealtre ewith number <br />Task a set <br />this. The has the ' and not <br />to that level• y are working, expertise to deal <br />though, to bring them up <br />City planner <br />from the Herman clarified the <br />time application is made time <br />limit y 120 days <br />Councilmember with the City, <br />beth the9qunoeloesnnowe%and lthe this is a way to deal <br />,inn. at <br />the hearing, y need them at the <br />M <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.