My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1988/10/10
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1988
>
Agenda Packets - 1988/10/10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/9/2025 10:50:37 AM
Creation date
4/9/2025 10:50:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
10/10/1988
Description
Regular Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
RegularyMeetingy Council �� "i�ti �' i Ei VED PagebEight, 1988 <br />---------------------------------------- ------- <br />years, at which time they would then expand to <br />accomodate future growth. <br />Ms. Weisman inquired how old the pipeline is that <br />is in place. Mayor Linke replied it is from 1957, <br />and the City is going to Court on it on January 1. <br />Clerk/Administrator Pauley added that indications <br />from Williams are that they feel the pipeline is <br />acceptable and if they are required to replace it, <br />it would be left in the same location, just maybe <br />lower. <br />Ms. Weisman asked what the coaparison was with <br />the Type 2 and 7 wetlands between the Corps of <br />Engineers and City's boundaries. <br />Mr. Koppe explained they are different, and both <br />bodies do approach it differently. He stated they <br />are attempting to keep out of the City's boundary <br />with the exception of the .7 acre. <br />Ms. Weisman asked what the advantage of a PUD would <br />be versus the alternatives. <br />C <br />Mayor Linke explained the advantages, stating that <br />since they are working with both the pipeline and <br />the wetlands, this would allow them some flexibility. l <br />Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported the Mounds View <br />Business Park and Kraus Anderson development of manor <br />homes and commercial area long Highway 10 are all. <br />PUD's, and hp reviewed the PUD process and the <br />benefits it provides to both the City and the <br />developer. <br />Ms. Weisman challenged the City to stay firm with <br />one set of boundaries for thn wetlands and suggested <br />having the Environmental Quality Task Force address <br />that. She also stated a lot of information need: to <br />be absorbed and she is concernec'. with the pressure <br />with the time ele:aent. She added the developer should <br />have acted quicker. <br />Mr. Seipp replied he could understand her concerns. <br />He explained, however, that they began their process of <br />looking for land to develop three nears aan and had <br />approval from their Board of Directors one year ago, <br />but the company was then put up for sale and all pro- <br />jects were put on hold for seven months. He added that <br />has created a major problem for them with the time <br />element. He also reiterated it would be their intent to <br />hold whatever meetings are necessary to answer any <br />questions and address any concerns. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.