Laserfiche WebLink
44 MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator and city Council <br />FROM: City Planner Herman <br />DATE: November 17, 1988 <br />SUBJECT: LANDSCAPE BOND FOR LANDMARK ESTATES <br />The company issuing the subject bond has reques'I thatpit be . <br />released or that Landmark Estates continues paying <br />After reviewing the files, Staff has recognized that this issue <br />should have Leen addressed quite some time ago after he <br />` <br />After site review of the <br />plantings had been made on site. <br />project, it was determined that there were a significant cumber <br />of trees caretakertattL'ad andmarkher not Es:.ateabeen had agreeddtoYreplucenthe trees The <br />that had been missing In °therCityconform <br />Councilto The treeslandscape <br />haveplan <br />since <br />that had been approved byboth by <br />been planmyself and the City <br />ed and have been reviewed ggested that we obtain a <br />Forester, :tick. Wriskey. kick has suggested <br />guaranty for one year of all the trees planted. I have notified <br />the Caretaker of this matter and he is willing to sign an <br />agreement to that effect. It is the intension of Staff that this <br />type of an agreement will be made with every development that <br />occurs in the future. <br />und <br />or Landmark <br />Staff recommends provaleof willthe be contingentbuponfan agreement <br />Estates. This mar <br />sinned for Landmark Estates yuarantying the plantings of a <br />ll <br />tree:: f°r one year. <br />KJFI/BAC <br />�„a <br />