Laserfiche WebLink
INMounds YiAw City Council / �9 b A D <br />- <br />Regular Meeting -- -----------VVV {�,� <br />Commission wo,ild recommend issuance of the wesseddfor <br />alteration permit. The two issues they <br />variances were the 100' setback for <br />e0roadting witch <br />they felt was justified for safety in c <br />County Road J, and the variance for being within the <br />100' buffer zone, due to thehlocation of the rilliams <br />no <br />pipeline on the property. oper is osing to move <br />longer exists, as the dthelpipeline, which will take <br />the building closer to the 'p <br />them completely out of the buffer. <br />Peter Seipp, president of SYSCo/Minnesota, briefly <br />he <br />reviewed their intei,ded use of the building�entdteam <br />introduced the other members of the develop <br />that were present with him. <br />, ► . <br />November 14, 1988 <br />Page Two <br />---- <br />Scott Kshowin theiran cationuinitoe city, access toreviewed the o <br />posal, showing <br />the property, parking, the location of the F:uildrng <br />on the lot, and the planned construction materials. <br />He explained a number of revisions have been made to <br />the site plans due to wetland cone=rns, aahave d he beenewed <br />the changes made. He also explained <br />the buffer zone. <br />able to move the building out of the <br />Peter Sabee, o£ 8os2dFdevelopment atexplained therequest od <br />had <br />reviewed 'ne proi? <br />evaluation looked <br />the City, and in the course of that <br />at the development with respect to sPeCsfof Engineers <br />as specified in the ordinance, the Cocp <br />wetland delineation and Mounds View's wetland delinea- <br />tion. <br />Mr. Sabee reviewed the conditions <br />sto ichbe gmustebed. met <br />for e. wetlands alteration permit <br />Sabee rpejdCanwritten <br />report <br />tefindings <br />on the prmtgdardsin thewetlanuodinance <br />specifically concerning fillin9unstraints and removal <br />atorm water- run-off, building <br />of vegetation. iia stated that in summary, all <br />ltthe <br />c the <br />criteria listedlicationoandrCity Ordinance, and he <br />development app <br />recommended the Council consider having the work <br />areas delineated so there ig an understanding of <br />which be impacted, <br />_.,,.iAined the proposed develoE:,ient does <br />---'- o <br />not fall within the 1001year d he flood bo reviewedthe <br />Chapter 49 does not app y, <br />requirements of Chapter 49a. <br />Mr. Sabee stated in summary that a review of the locu- <br />development indicate <br />ments submitted for the prop- <br />compliancP with all requirements of Chapters 48, 49 <br />unicipl Code, with one <br />and 49A of the Mounds View Maccessato the development <br />exception, that the roadway <br />N <br />