Laserfiche WebLink
1988 <br />November 2, <br />Mounds View Planning Commission <br />Page Four I <br />Regular Meeting -------------------- <br />---------------------- <br />-------------------- <br />Commissioner Miller stated the proposal does not <br />this looks nice, <br />look like typical storage, and while <br />be a in keeping others <br />there would still problem <br />The Planning Commission is charged with up- <br />out. <br />holding the Code and should. She added that as <br />it could fit <br />far as theD-2 zoning: she sees how <br />what would happen with <br />in there, Lut questioned <br />other proposals. <br />Commissioner Saunders stated he has a problem with <br />he feels it <br />both the variance and the zoning, and <br />1-1. He added that while <br />fits better into B-4 or <br />job, it is not what he <br />they have done a very nice <br />in B-2. They need to be placed somewhere# <br />M <br />looks for <br />and the issue must be addressed. <br />Mr. Jensen stated he feels they could serve the <br />location. <br />?, <br />people of the City best in this proposed <br />Mr. Black stated the agenda item is: the variance <br />Planning Commission <br />request and he would like the <br />that at this time. He added he <br />to take action on <br />the time the Planning Commission has <br />appreciates <br />taken, and they would like to be able to move on <br />to the Council level with their request. <br />City Planner Herman advised that in addition to the <br />the right of way <br />variance issue, the vacation of <br />the property to the north, as <br />may have impact on <br />that property is considering using <br />the owner of <br />to his property. Another issue to <br />that as access <br />consider is the PUD designation with one resi- <br />th? intent <br />dential unit, and whether that is really <br />of a mixed use PUD. She also rpoocaedthat wastturned <br />p <br />may be another mini storage po <br />zoning and a precedent' <br />down due to the district's <br />may have beer. set. <br />Second:. Burgers/Saunders to adopt Resolu- <br />Motign <br />tion 298-88, denying a variance request for <br />a <br />Storage, In ck <br />10,c SilverlLakeoWoods,aPlanningtion <br />ofblic Lot 1, Block <br />Case No. 254-88. <br />Motion Carried <br />7 ayes 0 nays <br />Tore Wistrom# of Kraus Anderson, asked how many <br />in the_city above <br />other undeveloped properties <br />five acres could be ciassiiieU Yor -• <br />City Planner Herman explained there is not a lot <br />of vacant land in the City, buc any type of <br />5 could fall <br />redevelopment that would have acres <br />into that category. <br />