Agenda Packets - 1988/08/08 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

July 25, 1988Page Mounds View City Council Ten Regular Meeting ------------------------------------- Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed the request for 14. ofnsideratigm an occupancy permit for Building A in the Mounds View Staff wo':ld Number 2361 Business Park, and the two conditions that the sodding of the banks of the storm recommend, water retention pond on the east side of the building be completed by October 1, 1988, and any difference in the original plan for the number of trees proposed in the project and those actually planted once the entire project has been completed be made up for through as agreed supplementary plantings on the site, to the City unds View between the developer and through a supplementary landscaping plan. Clerk/Administrator Fauley also asked for approval of forfeiture. the certificate of completion and release of Motion/Second: Quick/Hankner to approve Resolution. permit for Building No. 2361, approving the occupancy Mounds View Business Park, and waive the reading. A, Motion Carried 5 ayes 0 nays Mayor Linke explained why the number of trees is down the recommended best fron the original plan, due to being further apart than was originally later placement planned. He added the numbers will be made up in the development. Motion/Second: Hankner/Quick to authorize the Mayor agreement for an C erk A inistrator to enter into an Forfeiture, Certificate of Comple'i.on and Release of for Deed Doc,amen'c Nuriber 867973. Motion carried 5 ayes 0 nays Attorney Meyers advised the preliminary plat presented :5. Consideration of Request for by Harst,3 Company must be acted on by the Ci.ty within tonight would be SuGrea a definite time period, and action time. He advised the Council to vision, Grean- vision, within the prescribed the requirements of Chapter, 48, with three field Estates, Case Planning consider specific issues to be addressed, the minimum lut size the minimum lot No. 97 requirement of 20,000 square feet, the loo foot setback require- width of 125 feet, and ment crow the wetland. He explained that in order for this development to is requesting get off the ground, the developer three requirements, stating a variances to those hardship due to the platting to the south of theirs which impaired their ability to develop, and that Mounds View's ordinance is overly restrictive. that in a court order from Attorney Meyers advised November 16, 1981, in Harstad versus Mounds View, injunction where Mr. Harstad had moved for a temporary the south, that the against the City on the plat to