Agenda Packets - 1989/01/03 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL PAGE SEVEN DECEMBER 29, 1988 and emphasize one policy framework, whether that be commercial or residential? Additionally, should the corridor be treated the same along its entire length or should it be segmented dependant upon existing circumstances? Pages 5-5 and 5-6 list development framework guidelines. These guidelines are concepts that City could adopt to assist in beautifying Fig? -way 10 and proviap for an identity of Mounds View. In my opinion, none of the guidelines should be controversial. The guidelines can be phased in over time to a greater or lesser degree depending upon the resources of the City and property owners adjacent to Highway 10. Mounds View Trunk Highway 10 Deveiopmei,t Framework Guidelines: 1. T.H. 10 should function as the City's main street and project a positive and identifiable jMMS for Mounds View. 2. To achieve that image and identity, major gateways physically marking the entrances to the community should be established at the east and west entrances of T.H. 10. 3. Landscape, signing, and building material guidelines should be established for the areas adjacent to and part of the corridor. 4. The corridor should be segmented into identifiable management and use districts with appropriate regulations aid invest- ments to reinforce the differing but coordinated districtir.g. 5. Landsca a ar,d li kiting harmony should be ac:ieved over time with a coordinated program of public investments in the right-of-way and private investment adjacent as development or redevelopment ocGOrs.