My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1989/01/03
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1989
>
Agenda Packets - 1989/01/03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 4:12:53 PM
Creation date
4/15/2025 4:11:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
1/3/1989
Description
Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council <br />Regular Meeting <br />asking the cities involved for their support of this <br />study. He explained the portion of County Road J <br />that runs through Mounds View would involve about <br />$7500000 in reconstruction costs, and Mounds View <br />would have the opportunity to request added improve— <br />ments be done at the same time. He added that <br />while they are asking for a commitment from the <br />City to help finance the feasibility report, the <br />City's share of the cost would be proportionate to <br />what they request to be done. <br />December 12, 1988 <br />Page Seven <br />There was discussion among councilmembers on the subject <br />funding sources and synchronizing city and county priorities. <br />Ultimately, it is the taxpayers who pay one way or another, <br />which through city tax, county tax or gas tax. There was <br />also discussion on yaws and possible changes that might <br />be pursued. <br />Motion_ /Second: Hankner/Quick that the City make a <br />commitment to Ramsey County for a portion of the <br />cost of the feasibility study for the County Road <br />+<, J project, and direct Public Worts Director Minetor <br />to participate as the City's representative. <br />5 ayes 0 nays <br />City Planner Herman reviewed proposed Resolution <br />No. 2422. she explained three letters had beer. <br />received 'back in response to the EAW, with no <br />substantial impact and no request for an EIS. <br />Motion/Second: Wuori/Blanchard to approve Reso— <br />lution No. 2422, approving the environmental <br />assessment worksheet for the SYSCO Development, <br />and waive the reading. <br />5 ayes 0 nays <br />There was discussion on the indirect source <br />permit, which City Planner Herman was getting a <br />letter on, but that has no bearing on the EIS. <br />Scott Kinkaid, of Ryan Construction, explained <br />work'has been going very well and they are about <br />finished now, and will start up again in the spring. <br />Motion Carried <br />11. Consideration <br />of Resolution <br />No. 2422 <br />Motion Carried <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.