Laserfiche WebLink
Sim they inties is at the expense <br />effect subsidize small sy:_e <br />of large systsms. since most clto be utilities <br />self <br />supporting fund, this idea appearsstem is <br />impact on Mounds View varies with each scheme. our system <br />as impacted <br />intermediate in size and therefore does not benefit from the <br />subsidizing of small systems, bu'wouldsrecommend thealso not rCity declare a <br />as the very large sy mloao fit closely <br />cla a cost of service scheme or a combination of the <br />costOf s to be <br />cost of service and the operating fee e�„r,��..�• <br />with our ph-loscpLy of user fees for utilities and. seem <br />most fair to our situation. <br />be shown on the water bill as a surcharge for water quality <br />when the testing costs become effective a recommend the charge <br />testing" regCired by the State Department of Health. The reason <br />is two -fold. First, we feel the customers should realize there is <br />additional testing being done to insure safe drinking <br />mandatednby <br />second, we *ant them to also realize this t�eS�lege charges will <br />therefo=e, we can address this issue <br />state and federal legislation. It app <br />become effective in 1990; canaprocess. <br />again during the btdget and rate setting <br />