My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1989/03/06
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1989
>
Agenda Packets - 1989/03/06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/16/2025 2:37:23 PM
Creation date
4/16/2025 2:37:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
3/6/1989
Description
Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
-2- <br />Parcel B <br />Parcel 8 is a combination of three land -locked lots totalling .75 <br />acres. The County has appraised this parcel at $23,500.00; each <br />lot being appraised at approximately $7,800.Oo. Presently, the <br />lots seem to be of little value except to the adjacent property <br />owners who could extend their back lots. There is the potential <br />to develop these lots at a future date if a road were extended <br />mid -block. -This issue will be briefly discussed later. <br />The proposed use for these lots is a nursery area. The City <br />Forester has reviewed this proposal and has made the following <br />cast calculations: <br />Tree purchase (S00 evergreens) <br />Maintenance (labor - planting, water, $ 120.00 <br />mulching, etc.) <br />640 hours at $7.50/hour (average) 4 800.00 <br />Materials (chemicals, fertilizers, signs) 400.00 <br />Harvest and transplanting <br />280 hours at $7.50/hour x 2 4,200.00 <br />TOTAL $ 9,520.00 <br />AVERAGE $32.70/Tree <br />This figure dces not take into account the cost of acquisition nor <br />the salary of an additional staff member to run the n,irsery, It <br />that cae nurser would <br />trees approximate) eight y Produce 300 transplantable <br />Y 9 years later. <br />Potential costs to the City may be the conflicts which could arise <br />between the City and adjacent neighbors. It seems that these <br />residents have been using portions of this open space as their own <br />lawns. Another monetary cost, and perhaps political, may be the <br />placement of an access road into the interior lots. In <br />conclusion, it was felt by the Parks, Recreation and Forestry <br />Department that without monetary support for all facets of the <br />nursery implementation: supplies, land and laeor costs, it would <br />not be feasible for the Department to carry out this proposal. <br />An alternative use for a portion of the property was suggested by <br />City Engineer Minetor. It was suggested that an additional road <br />easement be obtained from Lots 8 and 9. While this acquisition <br />would produce a curved road accessing the interior of the block, <br />it would reduce the need to purcnase right-of-way from the eastern <br />edge of 7853 Long Lake Road. <br />There are two possible funding sources for purchase of these <br />parcels depending upon the use of the property. If the lots were <br />used as a nursery the funds could come out of the Park Improvement <br />Fund. If the City obtained a portion of this property for road <br />right-of-way the Silver Lake Woods Project Fund could be used. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.