My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1989/03/20
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1989
>
Agenda Packets - 1989/03/20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/16/2025 2:39:59 PM
Creation date
4/16/2025 2:39:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
3/20/1989
Description
Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator and City Council <br />FROM: City Planner Herman <br />DATE: February 15, 1989 <br />SUBJECT: TAX FORFEITED LANDS <br />In the recent past, various Councilmembers have expressed interest <br />in acquiring tax forfeited lands located within the City. Various <br />uses have beer. proposed for each of the parcels. The feasibility <br />Of these uses versus the cost of acquisition will be d <br />the following: iscussed in <br />Parcel A <br />Parcel A is a triangular shaped wetland measuring 1.63 acres. The <br />County has appraised the property at $1,400'00, although the <br />intended use by the City is to have it remain vacant. At the <br />present time this property is rendered unbuildable by the City's <br />wetland ordinance as the entire parcel is contained within the <br />wetland or its buffer. It is because of the wetlands designation <br />that the City may wish to purchase the property. <br />In the future, wetland parcels, especially those in private hands, _ <br />may need to be acquired under threat cf the raking issue. Until <br />the erect o ordinance ca is overturned in court or a legal opinion is <br />rendered on the issue of taking, it has been assumed that the City <br />would not be purchasing wetlands. The City may be setting a <br />precedent by obtaining this wetland. <br />Potential costs to the City over and above acquisition costs may <br />be the maintenance of the wetland area. It is reasonable to <br />assume chat nearby residents will expect City maintenance of the <br />wetland occur upon discovering new ownership. Maintenance would <br />be hampered by lack of funding for clean-up and no public access <br />to the site. Potential benefits may include enhancement of the <br />wetland which may produce better storage capacity and aesthetic <br />and natural improvements. <br />Funding for acquisition costs may be obtained from the General <br />Fund or more appropriately, the Storm Water Management Fund. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.