My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1989/04/17
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1989
>
Agenda Packets - 1989/04/17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/16/2025 2:43:24 PM
Creation date
4/16/2025 2:43:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
4/17/1989
Description
Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MEMORANDUM <br />Memo To :Don Paulev, Clery_;d_:_• <br />Wlnistrator <br />From ;Ric Minetor, City Engineer fox <br />Date :April 10, 1989 f <br />Subject ;"SLOW CHILDREN PLAYING" Sign Request <br />The Minnesota Statutes require sign to be consistent+�«h <br />Manual Of Uniform 'rreffi, CrOl Devices. Thpromote uniform,.+.., O 7tn pu+ - <br />4� `o <br />state and to limit proliferationlofsand signs which might reduce the <br />benefit of si acrosslations the <br />at liberty to�ignorecthis standard. The TMUTCD sets arufore standards for <br />ities are not <br />the use of certain signs as well as standards for signing in <br />general. <br />The ound <br />children's play areas, i.e. limited to areas designated as <br />sign is either a symbol si parks, schools, beaches, etc. This <br />totter or a sign with the me sage "CHILDREN two cPLAYING" or a similar <br />en on a teeter - <br />message. it is normally a 36" diamond sign with a black message <br />on a yellow background. To enhance the effectiveness of this sign <br />at parks and similar locations, its use or use of similar signs <br />should be restricted to o <br />should not have these snly areas used by large numbers of <br />children. Even a park without play equipment or athletic fields <br />igns. <br />Ma:iy residents dislike this restriction. Their attitude is Oat <br />these signs should be located in areas where children live. This <br />would require signs on nearly every street in the City and would <br />almost eliminate any effectiveness of the sign at truly hazardous <br />locations. I have been involved with this controversy many times <br />as a traffic engineer; at the City of Wheat Ridge a solution was <br />reached that met the residents concerns. A green rectangular sign <br />with a white legend was authorized for use in limited locations. <br />The signread "PROTECT OUR CHILDREN - PLEASE DRIVE CAREFULLY". <br />I would suggest we adopt a similar policy. A legend and color <br />scheme should be adopted, blue letters on a white/silver <br />background or white letters on a green background are acceptable; <br />but all signs should be the same. I personally favor bILe on <br />white. Conditions should be set for the installation, i.e. a <br />minimum concentration of children under a certain age; number of <br />signs; roads/streets on which signs can be placed; location and <br />height of signs; and reasons for removal. This last is important, <br />the concentrations of children vary and at some time there would <br />be no benefit in continuing to have the sign. I would recommend <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.