My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1989/04/24
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1989
>
Agenda Packets - 1989/04/24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/16/2025 2:44:18 PM
Creation date
4/16/2025 2:44:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
4/24/1989
Description
Regular Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
irr <br />E*W1N <br />Insurance Agency2732 NE Highway /10 <br />Mounds View, MN 55432 s 6121780.5600 <br />April 18, 1989 <br />TO: Mounds View City Council Members <br />Sue Hankner <br />Diane Wuori <br />John Paone, Sr. <br />Gary Quick <br />.Phyllis Blanchard <br />R M: George J. Winiecki <br />SUilJJ&= Ordinance No. 466 <br />My name is George Winiecki. I am the property owner at 2732 <br />and 2740 N.E. Highway 110 in Mounds View, Minnesota. Being that <br />I could not attend the Council Meeting, I thought it best to write <br />you this letter to express my concern about ordinance number 466. <br />I am definitely not in favor of this ordinance and neither <br />_ are other property owners that are affected by it. I hope that <br />( they will also respond. Currently, I have my property for sale <br />and have a signed agreement with some buyers. However, after <br />hearing about this ordinance, they are reconsidering their offer. <br />Their reasons are: <br />1) Why buy if they cannot build for a year or more <br />2) They don't know what the zoning iay be coimpared <br />to existing zoning. <br />No developer will invest in property that is affected by ordinance <br />466. Obviously, this has the potential to create a suhstartlal <br />economic loss to me. It also prauents me from expanding and <br />developing my existing business. <br />For years the city could not attract developers. Now that <br />developers are coming forward, ytu are trying to put on the brakes <br />and restrict development. <br />1 don't understand your reasoning for ordinance No. 466. It <br />is similar to asking me to shut my business down for a year or more <br />and take a loss. Well, I will not do that. If this ordinance is <br />passed, someone will have to reimburse me for the economic loss. <br />Put yourself in my position, would you be willing, as a property <br />owner, to take a substancial loss. <br />® Also, why does this ordinance affect just a few property owners? <br />When in fact it should be all property thatborders Highway 110 in <br />the city liTits of Mounds View. <br />� I �.. <br />Respectfully, <br />6eoYge J�{ iP�mecki �""�� \ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.