My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1989/07/10
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1989
>
Agenda Packets - 1989/07/10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/16/2025 2:50:47 PM
Creation date
4/16/2025 2:50:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
7/10/1989
Description
Regular Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
182
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council June 26, 1989 <br />Regular Meeting Page Eight <br />Attorney Kerney reported that under the ordinance <br />in Chapter 100.06, interest in more than one <br />license in the same class by one individual is <br />not allowed. Mr. Waste has an interest in both <br />Loose Ends on 10 and Robert's Off 10, and has been <br />aware for over a year that it is against the <br />ordinance. The interest he has in Loose Ends on <br />LO is a fee interest. <br />Councilmember Paone questioned why he couldn't <br />receive the license, as he is only the owner and <br />not the operator of Loose Ends on 10. <br />Attorney Kerney read from the ordinance, which <br />states interest is not allowed in any other establish- <br />ment in the City. In the past the Counci] has <br />required the property be put in someone elses name, <br />which Mr. Waste has dono in hho naef —A <br />again. <br />_.. _.. I— ...... ..v Y1V uV <br />Councilmember Quick pointed out that once in t::e <br />past the City took no action on the renewal of a <br />license and the property reverted back to the <br />original owner. The Council was advised by Attorney <br />Meyers at that time that they must issue a license. <br />He pointed out the property could possibly revert <br />back to Mr. Waste, leaving him with two liquor <br />licenses. <br />Clerk/Administrator Pauley stated giving a person <br />a license is Granting a property right, and if it <br />is not renewed, they are denying the right of the use <br />of the property. <br />Councilmember Blanchard pointed out Mr. Povl.'.':zki <br />held two licenses at the same time, althought it <br />was not known by the Council at that time and was <br />done in error. <br />Councilmember Quick pointed out Mr. Waste has been <br />aware of this situation for at least one year and <br />has had ample time to work out a solution. <br />Attorney Kerney advised Mr. Waste would have to <br />divest himself of the ownership interest in Loose <br />Ends on 10. <br />Motion/Second: Quick/Wuori to approve the issuance <br />of thz license for on -sale intoxicating and Sunday <br />sales license for Robert's Off 10, contingent upon <br />divestiture of ownership of Loose Ends on 10 by <br />•Robert Waste, in a manner acceptable to the City <br />Attorney, prior to the close of business at 4:30 PM <br />on June 30, 1989. <br />5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.