Laserfiche WebLink
CENCS-CO-R (69-842-12) ISSUED: May 25, 1989 <br />SUBJECT: Notice of Application for Permit <br />Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. Any comments relative to Minnesota <br />Pollution Control Agency actions may be sent to: <br />Minnesota Pollution Control Agency <br />Program Development <br />Division of Water Quality <br />520 Lafayatte Road <br />St. Paul, Rinneeota 55155 <br />7. DI STORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL <br />This public notice is being sent to the National Park Service, the State <br />Archaeologist, and the State Historic Preservation Officer to determine if <br />there are known cultural resources Which may be affected by the deccribed <br />work. Any unknown archaeological, scientific, or historical data could be <br />lost or destroyed by the work described in the permit application. However, <br />the latest version of the National Register of Historic Places has been <br />consulted and no listed properties (known to be eligible for inclusion, or <br />included in the Register) are located in the project area. <br />S. MBLIC HEAF.IHO REQUESTS <br />Any person may request, in writing, within the comment period specified in <br />this notice, that a public hearing be held to consider this application. <br />Requests for public heartngs shall state, in detail, the reasons for holding a 1 <br />public hearing. A request may be denied if substantive reasons for holding a <br />hearing are not provided or if there Is otherwise no valid interest to be <br />served. <br />9. PUBLIC INTEREST REVIEW <br />The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the <br />probable impact, including cumulative impacts, of tho proposed activity on the <br />public interest. That decision will reflect the national concern for both <br />protection and utilization of important resources. The benefit which <br />reasonably may be expected to &ecru* from the proposal must be balanced <br />against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. All factors which may be <br />relevant to the proposal will be considered, including the cumulative effects. <br />Among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental <br />concerns, wetlands, cultural values, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards, <br />floodplain values, land use, navigation, shoreline erosion and accretion, <br />rocreation, rater supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, <br />safety, food and fiber production and, in general, the needs and welfare of <br />the people. Environmental and other documents will be available for review in <br />the St. 2aul District Office. <br />FOR THE DISTRICT ENGINEER: <br />1 Encl WH. L. GOETZ <br />Chief, Construction -Operations Division �� <br />