Laserfiche WebLink
��. Tn. %J sYOR - <br />FROM: <br />DATE: JUNE 1, 1989 <br />SUBJECT: SILVER VIEW PART: PATHWAY EXTENSION PROJECT <br />41t2-141� 4 <br />The materials cost of the pathway extension has been budgeted in 1989. It was originally <br />planned that City staff would perform the pathway installation. However, the heavy <br />schedule of Public Works does not allow timely installation of this pathway (early Sumer) <br />as indicated to the residents. Therefore, staff has requested bids on this project. Three <br />bids were received. Those bids are attached. I have performed reference checks on each <br />and I am prepared to discuss each proposal at the agenda meeting. <br />It has also been recommended and staff agrees that installation of a large culvert at the <br />west side storm water sewer outlet would be a wise investment. This culvert would allow <br />park maintenance vehicles to drive on the nail and over the ditch for greater efficient trail <br />maintenance, The cost of the two culvert options are: <br />option #1 - 48" culvert $ 6,500.00 <br />Oprion #2 - Metal arch $13,000.00 <br />Option #3 - Inexpensive pedestrian bridge which <br />would barely allow a small pick-up. <br />$20,000 - 25,000.00 <br />The size and style of the second culvert option has been recommended by City Engineer <br />Minetor. It will be large enough to 1" 1e the five year storm. <br />The for the basic <br />extension which <br />basically get coversthe materials oco is of all thetprop proposals (except the asphalt option <br />The additional options of labor for contracting the work and the cost of installation and <br />Purchase of a culvert is additional unbudgeted expenses that could be funded with monies <br />from the Park Improvement Fund. <br />Staff will be in attendance at the agenda meeting to discuss this park project and seek <br />direction from the council as to how this project should proceed. <br />MS/SL <br />Attachment <br />