My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1989/05/22
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1989
>
Agenda Packets - 1989/05/22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/16/2025 3:06:16 PM
Creation date
4/16/2025 3:06:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
5/22/1989
Description
Regular Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
f- r,% 7 <br />MEMO TO: Planning Commission 7'a0 P.M, <br />FROM: Clerk -Administrator Paule5f <br />DATE: April 13, 1989 <br />EW BUSINESS <br />SUBJECT: PARK,BCONDITIONAL USE IPERMIT, PLANNEDNUNITIDEVELOPMENT <br />FINAL PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW <br />Chi have separately applied for <br />Taco Bell and Kentucky Fried <br />conditional use permits to construct drive-in restaurant <br />facilities on tY.e parcel of land in the Mounds View Business Park <br />a lied for a P.U.D. final plan and development <br />development for which a restaurant has been des <br />They <br />have jointly pp pint project on the site. The essen- <br />review approval on their j <br />iR of the proposal are outlinenal,letter9, whichfrom .is <br />ment „atcd April <br />Tim Nelson of Everest Develop <br />the cover sheet to the large packet °latefsecticns ofcthe eMounds <br />this View I em- pAlsoodecrelatingetoPthose items the development must <br />comply with. simply <br />At this time, I would like to address the development by <br />reviewing for you the specific: issues proposallhasvbeenereferred to <br />during my review. The development Engineer and City Forester for <br />i the police Chief, Fire chief, <br />CddYIEreceive any response from <br />their review and comment. <br />will be Providing You with <br />them prior to the April 19 meeting, I <br />their comments at that time. The issues I have identified and <br />to them are as follows: <br />any comments I have in reoonse <br />a commercial y by theium twowparties. <br />1. The Developer proposes but used jointly Y <br />the lot is not splitart of the Proposal to Cityfromfrom <br />I have r.ysfMeyersthat and Karney and requested an op <br />Attorneys Y <br />them. <br />y. The total parking for the proposed devequiresta1total of <br />stalls. Chapter 40.07, Subd. 8(14), req <br />ed <br />in a total parking space requirement of <br />38 spaces for Taco Bell and 37 spaces for Kentucky requirement <br />Chicken resulting ect exceeds the required <br />sp <br />75 spaces. Therefore, the pros Zoning Code. <br />number of aces Per the City' <br />3 ?,though the final stage plans are normally approved <br />administrat ivelY, this is only done when the final stage <br />plan is consistent 'with orelncesehispp[oocsaloiseat and <br />development stage plans, <br />significant deviation from the approved develooment stay <br />plans far the restaurant site, Staf: is referring the <br />//��,,� final stage plans to the ?I-ann:ng Commission and Council <br />' 7 =or r„i:e-w and approval. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.