My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1989/02/21
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1989
>
Agenda Packets - 1989/02/21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/16/2025 3:13:42 PM
Creation date
4/16/2025 3:13:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
2/21/1989
Description
Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
93
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The Ramsey County Master Plan subscribes to the theory that <br />participation must be built first through efforts in public <br />education, containers, and increased collection frequency. Once <br />these program components are in place and if a city is still not <br />meeting their goal, then the Master Plan calls for consideration <br />of a mandatory ordinance. The Master Plan calls for this <br />evaluation to take place in 1991. This schedule allows time to <br />demonstrate whether voluntary efforts will achieve the recycling <br />goals. <br />The Metropolitan Council has recently recommended that Ramsey <br />County adopt a mandatory source separation ordinance by January <br />1, 1989. The main difference between the Metropolitan Council <br />recommendation and the current policy in the Master Plan is the <br />timing of implementation. Ramsey County staff believe that <br />promotion and public education, convenient collections, special <br />containers, and economic incentives through volume -based fees <br />will increase participation so that the source separation goals <br />will be achieved with voluntary programs. if not, then a <br />mandatory source separation ordinance should be adopted, but only <br />when: <br />- voluntary participation has been given an adequate chance; <br />- there is some method for enforcement; and <br />- sufficient forewarning has been given to allow the implemen- <br />tation of a major promotional effort explaining the ordinance. <br />To allow time to address the problems with a mandatory ordinance, <br />Ramsey County has adopted the Opportunity to Recycle policy with <br />an effective date in early 1989, with mandatory ordinances <br />enacted in 1991 for cities not meeting the 1990 source separation <br />goal. This approach is consistent with the Solid Waste Master <br />Plan. If a city should decide that they need to adopt a mandatory <br />ordinance before 1991 in order to meet their recycling goals, <br />this would still be consistent with Ramsey County's plans. For <br />instance, it appears that the City of Saint Paul may adopt a <br />mandatory ordinance with an effective date in the fall of 1989. <br />Although it is unknown at this.time what form tks ordinance may <br />take, much of their discussion to date has focused on the need <br />for containers and incentives for increasing participation. These <br />are components that Ramsey County has determined to be necessary <br />for an effective recycling program (see discussion below) and so <br />Saint Paul's intentions are very consistent with the County's <br />plans. Ramsey County staff will be monitoring Saint Paul's <br />progress in developing and enforcing such an ordinance. <br />Frequency of Collections <br />Policy Statement: Curbside recycling programs should be conducted <br />on a twice -a -month basis or provide a similar level of <br />convenience. This goal should be met in 1990. <br />40 Curbside collection should be conducted twice -monthly at a <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.